Message from @ThatsRandom
Discord ID: 624351657576366093
Maybe, idk about that though haha
Although if I'm being honest to me "right-wing" and "left-wing" are pretty much the same
Like, when taken to their extremes they end up at the exact same place
>muh horseshoe
LMFAO
I mean, yeah I guess you could phrase it that way 😛
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
<:why:462286147473637407>
Have mercy on my heathen soul
I didn’t want to deal with the horseshoe argument
<:sarGOY:462286263622303754>
<:thinkcide2:462282425486147585>
I mean I'm not trying to make an argument for it
I'm just saying that from where I stand, both "wings" are more similar than different
Ok
That's because you are doing a univariate analysis like Feminists do to kvetch about wage gap
Sorry I didn’t listen to you m8 I just didn’t want to argue over left wing and right wing
@Monstrous Moonshine I barely understood half of what you just said
One aspect might be "same", but they differ over thousand other aspects
So feminists complain about wage gap
But they don't take into account many factors
Right.
Like amount of work done by men, kind of work done by men, willingness of women to do those work, maternity leaves etc.
Turns out, when you normalize for these factors, the wage gap vanishes
You're doing a similar thing
Ye, I know that, but what's this got to do with my 'univariate analysis' ?
Looking at one factor where "extremes" are same
And overlooking thousand other factors
In other words, only considering one variable in your horseshoe theory
Idk about that
The way I see it, is that although the words of "right/left wingers" may differ
their actions are ultimately very similar
I don't see any far right "extremist" rallying for the acceptance of trannies in women's bathroom
Lmao
And obviously, the more extreme they get, the more similar they become
Again, you're basing this "similarity" only on one or two parameters
They are distinct in thousand other parameters
The same could be said of what you just did lmao