Message from @ThatsRandom
Discord ID: 624351223071506438
huh
I didn't know that lol
So the original term refers to supporters of Monarchy
You have it completely backwards
Right. Well that's definitely not what I'm referring to haha
The modern Right-Left distortion is an Amerimuttt propaganda
Where they tried to subvert RW by injecting small govt.
Maybe, idk about that though haha
Although if I'm being honest to me "right-wing" and "left-wing" are pretty much the same
Like, when taken to their extremes they end up at the exact same place
>muh horseshoe
LMFAO
I mean, yeah I guess you could phrase it that way 😛
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
<:why:462286147473637407>
Have mercy on my heathen soul
I didn’t want to deal with the horseshoe argument
<:sarGOY:462286263622303754>
<:thinkcide2:462282425486147585>
I'm just saying that from where I stand, both "wings" are more similar than different
Ok
That's because you are doing a univariate analysis like Feminists do to kvetch about wage gap
Sorry I didn’t listen to you m8 I just didn’t want to argue over left wing and right wing
@Monstrous Moonshine I barely understood half of what you just said
I'm doign a what ?
One aspect might be "same", but they differ over thousand other aspects
So feminists complain about wage gap
But they don't take into account many factors
Right.
Like amount of work done by men, kind of work done by men, willingness of women to do those work, maternity leaves etc.
Turns out, when you normalize for these factors, the wage gap vanishes
You're doing a similar thing
Ye, I know that, but what's this got to do with my 'univariate analysis' ?
Looking at one factor where "extremes" are same
And overlooking thousand other factors
In other words, only considering one variable in your horseshoe theory
Idk about that
The way I see it, is that although the words of "right/left wingers" may differ