Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 623301252100390944
@π―ππ_πΆππππππππ Well, should asexuality be considered a mental illness as well, instead of sexuality?
Asexuality does not involve two adults. It involves one adult not interested in sex.
Hence it should probably be a crime.
And thus, there is no interaction.
You said nothing about interaction earlier.
There is no act to criminalize.
Same goes with pedosexuality, if one only faps to Japanese manga.
Hence there's no interaction either.
99% anti-pedo arguments are bullshit and retarded moralism.
I wouldn't consider, as a general statement, the protection of children as 'retarded moralism'; I don't think that japanese pornographic illustrations should be banned, though.
Protection of what children, in case of manga?
None; Which is why I said I don't think that manga should be banned on those grounds.
You do acknowledge that people oppose the idea of "pedosexual" because when it comes to pedos "rape is **ALWAYS** included".
Even when DSM wanted to create a definition of pedosexuality as **NON-OFFENDING** pedophile, thus definitionally non-abusive and non-interactive. And people like Sargon went insane moralist retards over it.
I acknowledge that premise, yes.
Because "it shouldn't be normalized".
Why should homosexuality be "normalized"?
If pedophilia is natural then we need artificial natural selection
It's not normal!
Through state laws saying βdonβt rape kidsβ
Homosexuality will never be normal. It will **always** remain a minority and by that criteria alone, never normal.
I don't really approve of homosexuality either, but I believe that whatever occurs between two or more consenting adults within the privacy of their own property is their own business.
Well weβre past that point
With how gay pride parades are now days
Aye, which is why I don't like those parades.
If it was a parade of dudes in jeans and t-shirts just sort of waving, no one would give a fuck.
Again, what is the problem with the idea that whatever occurs with one person alone should also be their own business?
It is too common that both the left and the right want to ban porn. One side because "God" the other side because "women", but both sides want porn gone, while none would criminalize sex between adults despite being more dangerous than masturbation.
Criminalizing sex between adults would end our civilization though
Also, if everything is OK with "two adults", should threesome be a crime?
Literally no one can argue that
I did say 'Two or More'.
It is three, not two, even if consented.
Why not also one?
Why is it "two or more"?
Why criminalize masturbation? Why do you need to have a partner?
Is it because if you say "one adult" you think there's also one child involved? How about two adults and one child? There's two adults, hence it's OK?
I don't understand the criteria "two or more".
It does **NOTHING** to protect children. It just make it a gangrape instead of one-against-one rape.
Homos debating fucking children
what a surprise