Message from @π―ππ_πΆππππππππ
Discord ID: 623299949614071823
Yeah, especially when it comes to rejecting relationship with a tranny.
If you let the lefties win.
And just like that, Hitler was elected for no reason at all.
It's really on all sides different kinks get different people wound up
The lefties are quite clueless as they continue to shoot their own foot by being increasing more and more insane.
Ye
Or are they
:p
Well, the Antifa types might just be accelerationists and wish for a Nazi regime to get their communist revolution.
People have grown quite susceptible to being shouted at too
I really don't see the problem with acknowledging "pedosexuality" as a thing.
I mean, child rape is a crime but so is prison rape.
Why not criminalize homosexuality or deny it as sexuality because prison rape is a crime?
Because at least being a homo involves, in theory, two consenting adults.
The argument that homosexuality is "natural" is BS, because rape is natural as well.
The argument that homosexuality is normal is BS, because it's still abnormality and a dysfunction of sexuality (as it prevents reproduction).
@π―ππ_πΆππππππππ Well, should asexuality be considered a mental illness as well, instead of sexuality?
Asexuality does not involve two adults. It involves one adult not interested in sex.
Hence it should probably be a crime.
And thus, there is no interaction.
You said nothing about interaction earlier.
Same goes with pedosexuality, if one only faps to Japanese manga.
Hence there's no interaction either.
99% anti-pedo arguments are bullshit and retarded moralism.
I wouldn't consider, as a general statement, the protection of children as 'retarded moralism'; I don't think that japanese pornographic illustrations should be banned, though.
Protection of what children, in case of manga?
None; Which is why I said I don't think that manga should be banned on those grounds.
You do acknowledge that people oppose the idea of "pedosexual" because when it comes to pedos "rape is **ALWAYS** included".
Even when DSM wanted to create a definition of pedosexuality as **NON-OFFENDING** pedophile, thus definitionally non-abusive and non-interactive. And people like Sargon went insane moralist retards over it.
I acknowledge that premise, yes.
Because "it shouldn't be normalized".
Why should homosexuality be "normalized"?
If pedophilia is natural then we need artificial natural selection
It's not normal!
Through state laws saying βdonβt rape kidsβ
Homosexuality will never be normal. It will **always** remain a minority and by that criteria alone, never normal.
I don't really approve of homosexuality either, but I believe that whatever occurs between two or more consenting adults within the privacy of their own property is their own business.
Well weβre past that point
With how gay pride parades are now days
Aye, which is why I don't like those parades.
If it was a parade of dudes in jeans and t-shirts just sort of waving, no one would give a fuck.