And I have enough commies around me already in here.

This one is far from it

For example there was one journal in philosophy of science that I really wanted to publish in until I saw the chief editor spewing venom at markets because they would allow the rich to exploit the rest of the world.

I'm serious dude, most of the philosophers of science i had seen tell me all about dialectics.

The thing about a lot of those people is that they really don't read very far in

And this is coming from as West as it can get.

A cellophane layer of compliance can veil an ocean of dissent, so to speak

The other two fields I have direct contact with-origins of life and astrobiology is that there is this absurd hypothesis

called the RNA world in the origins of life that gets like 90% of the funding and I'm really not onto that bandwagon

Well, you could start from another angle then

and astrobiology is practically owned by NASA which is the quintessence of Big government as you know it.

I'm actually trying to do that-I want to break in the filed of complexity science but am not so sure how to formulate a decent paper yet.

I know it will take more time and i have some shits in my personal life I need to solve, too.

This is a bit of an interesting read: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.08961.pdf

Well I'd start with the concepts overall, and then don't try the math in exacting bits, try it more in general logical forms and then derive equations from those

I think I may break through journals dedicated to complexity or system biology but need to find the right maths first.

https://youtu.be/aFdE__2OKc8

I really would love to finally publish that paper just don't know where and how.

Like when we did our equations for cloud bursting (use another machine like it was an extension of an existing one), we didn't start with the final product, we started with
"If you have the resources to, and need to, then burst"

But the thing is I can't get my PhD yet.

Not in this country and its educational environment.

I'm too *strange* for them.

Then we defined the resources, and the need requirements, and then we boiled those into mathematical statements to build the algorithm for it

Also have tons of problems accepting any applications, too.

This is why I decided to try different fields instead.

If we tried to tackle the math head on, it'd have been impossible

@Hexidecimark Well, what was the topic of the paper?

What model did you start with?

Real time AI based on cube computing is the full paper

The sub-paper we were doing was a facet of cube, and we started from scratch and a pile of information on computing

https://youtu.be/tYzMYcUty6s

I'm not really a computer scientist @Hexidecimark

I'm sorry if I can't get something.

It's no problem

By profession my field is biology, especially the fundamental one

And by extension-complexity, thou I don't know how to exactly define it yet.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/355619680762724352/625888057769459719/464132735_137300.jpg

Well, it's kind of order out of chaos but I think you understand one can't really name it, right?

Right now I am trying to link some of my ideas to the inner working of economic cycles theory.

For you, I would say...

Take order out of chaos, aye?

So we have that. Now we can break it down by a step. Think of some examples, and then consider- what can represent the most general, barebones version of these examples?

You know-the missing super theory of economics?