Message from @SnowPirate67
Discord ID: 623005737869770761
You’re referring to what is known as a “ schema ” in psychology terms by Piaget
The reason why I vehemently oppose individuals who seek to reverse the process.
as the set of representations expands, more traits are required to differntiate and identify an entity
yup
but rand described those concepts decades before they were published in psychological journals
Piaget describes these in the 20s
Gender was always an abstracted concept from the two, physical referents of male and female physiology.
He was way before Rand
but there is a diffrence between a 'slot and a signal'
To reverse the process and claim primacy in mind over reality is the very definition of insanity.
gender is a relative reference
Gender was always a concept in the language and was for some reason also applied to inanimate objects
^^Yup
it's critial for the opposite role to interact with given a degree of uncertainty
it's LESS critical for all of those who share the same key attributes
it's far more critical when the interaction is with one outside that group
gender is a 'slot'
and that slot sends signals to the other slot
change the slot, and the signals no longer work as intended
and the other slot has no way of knowing
you should read his work
his work is very differnet though
he doesn't address the elastisicity or the difference between percepts and concepts
say nothing for the neurological portion that accounts for the fact that both percepts and concepts have the same inputs but function in two different modes
i.e. percepts are subconcsious. children assimilate behaviours but aren't aware of how or the associations
much like sensory input from indivuidual nerves are processed on the level as a composite whole
concepts are made consciously and can be easily deconstructed
but they are both represetnational contructs
Based on your percepts.
I'm not entirely sure about that conscious part of concept creation
if people i meet dont remember my name no big deal but if they don't remember my starsign i lose my shit
there is a reason that a dog can only reach the intelligence of a child at the age when children typically learn to speak
because thought is language
the process of labeling the set of representations one has assembled about the world
Not entirely true. What's more you can (and should) read without vocalisation, same about thinking, it is possible to do it without naming or envisioning stuff
and being able to exchange those represetnations with others
it's not about the act of thinking
it is about the act of organizing representations