thats rather low

again

America has no obligation to take anyone in

thats like .001% immigration growth

for the uk i'd like 0 for a few years unless needed in industry

theres this thing called birthrates @Spooky Melon

^]

the goal should be to raise those

^

@Cadbal so if a swiss doctor decided to immigrate for whatever reason, you'd be against it?

not replace the current population

if you allow no one in

you are stil fucked

*still

@uk for example

if the position is needed, sure, if not, no

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

sure, the population will shrink

different groups with different interests

that have varying birth rates

unemplyed muslims, gtfo

but it's not impossible to go from a fertility rate of 1.4ish to 2.1

unemplyed druggie cunts, get a job or get drafted into army or hard labour

>swiss doctor
>unemployed muslim

What you want is to attract wealthy immigrants, with substantive contributions to offer the economy and such.

eh

You see

the entire point of preferential immigration

any inbetween mate?

here in Australia

@Cadbal sounds like you were saying there wasnt

we invited a fuck load of rich Chinese

get a points system

I just found out there is 112 genders, I refuted all of them because male and female were not on the list <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

and they fucking own everything now lmap

Lowering taxes, strengthening property rights, helps with this.

lmao*

man my English is no on point today

not*

fuck