Message from @ManAnimal

Discord ID: 626572100215242783


2019-09-26 00:09:09 UTC  

As long as it’s Harry who becomes king.
It’s about time we put a ginger in charge of the nukes.

2019-09-26 00:09:34 UTC  

no soul

2019-09-26 00:09:39 UTC  

Exactly

2019-09-26 00:09:39 UTC  

Fiery ginger in charge of the fiery arsenal

2019-09-26 00:09:40 UTC  

hmm

2019-09-26 00:09:57 UTC  

It’s the perfect nuclear deterrent.

2019-09-26 00:10:05 UTC  

Soulless ginger wont hesitate.

2019-09-26 00:10:24 UTC  

true, but his kids might start a nuclear holocaust

2019-09-26 00:10:36 UTC  

So Cardiff gets nuked

2019-09-26 00:10:51 UTC  

Would anyone really miss it?

2019-09-26 00:10:55 UTC  

lol

2019-09-26 00:11:11 UTC  

not like it would be any worse than the current power structure

2019-09-26 00:12:10 UTC  

For real though, the now independent former UK nations have a nuclear pact. Any attack on the British Isles is an attack on al of the British Isles.
Royal family has nukes and responds.

2019-09-26 00:12:23 UTC  

Scale down the military drastically

2019-09-26 00:12:29 UTC  

Keep out of world affairs

2019-09-26 00:13:01 UTC  

truthfully, UK would be a cider if there was an exchange as the US would get involved and Russia and china

2019-09-26 00:13:25 UTC  

Which is why modern militaries are so fkn wasteful rn

2019-09-26 00:13:37 UTC  

We don’t need all that shit.

2019-09-26 00:13:42 UTC  

tis true to an extent

2019-09-26 00:13:49 UTC  

but then you have all or nothing

2019-09-26 00:14:14 UTC  

We have nukes. Nukes ensure no world powers go to war.
The military exists solely to fuck with nations that don’t have nukes.

2019-09-26 00:14:26 UTC  

the left and this post-truth era in general doen't guarentee rational actors on either side

2019-09-26 00:14:30 UTC  

Good, fuck them up

2019-09-26 00:14:41 UTC  

We don’t need a massive standing army for that.

2019-09-26 00:14:46 UTC  

Imagine not having a nuke <:OMEGALUL:441699182768685056>

2019-09-26 00:15:26 UTC  
2019-09-26 00:15:40 UTC  

One battalion of highly trained sneaky-peeky types would be enough.
If it needs more than that, wtf are we doing there?

2019-09-26 00:15:53 UTC  

i would have to say that a nuke can only be used from a far. if china decided to employ a trojan horse tactic, UK would be easy pickens without conventional forces

2019-09-26 00:16:05 UTC  

can't exactly nuke them once they are in your midsts

2019-09-26 00:16:19 UTC  

But you can still nuke mainland China.

2019-09-26 00:16:28 UTC  

And China knows that

2019-09-26 00:16:28 UTC  

ethreen

2019-09-26 00:16:30 UTC  

who says they care?

2019-09-26 00:16:31 UTC  

why u e girl

2019-09-26 00:16:35 UTC  

Have you guys read into the wealth tax that Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are pushing?

They forget that billionaires don't just live in the United States, and the policies they're pushing will quickly lead to a situation where America's corporations are no longer owned by US citizens. Furthermore, because American corporations are no longer owned by US citizens, you can't even nationalize it anymore because that would lead to massive economic sanctions from every other country that matters.

2019-09-26 00:16:42 UTC  

THOT?

2019-09-26 00:16:55 UTC  

I got a fat ass pop can dick, dude.

2019-09-26 00:16:55 UTC  

e girl

2019-09-26 00:17:22 UTC  

Chinese communist party flees mainland china with enough troops to secure a beachead

2019-09-26 00:17:23 UTC  

Economic sanctions don’t matter when you’re going full commie