The fact is he didnt at first denounce fucking 11 year olds

@Edog Sweet christ

yeah he saved his ass 10 mins later

one cannot 'consent' at 11; it isn't possible

Doesnt mean much

@Vir Who?

wanted to see the reactions. kek @Jack of Trades

Sargon

@Edog Oh I understand

@Vir You mean you weren't being charitable.

"Oh he didnt' do it when *I* wanted him to"

vir is sperging

What a garbage argument.

not an argument

one person spergs, the other retaliaties

@ManAnimal Shut up, Taz isnt even a good Looney Toon

He'll never be Wile E. Coyote

Okay so when politicans and shit say some bs

then save their shit by giving up on it

its ok?

>Animal: Vir is sperging
>Also Animal: "YOU ARE ALL SAYING YOUR FEELINGS"

@Vir What?

You have to moralise and screech thing bad at all points and not have a conversation around it

@Azusa-chan Yes and?

Don’t you GET IT

no, it is not 'ok'

if I say i wanna shoot up the christ church mosque

but a year later

I say no I dont

but whether it is 'ok' is not a FACTUAL ARGUMENT

Im not a good person

@Vir What?

it is aMORAL ARGUMENT

Why not? Why aren't you a good person? Because of your thoughts?

Yeah Morals are important whats your point

Im saying this just casts some doubt on Sargon

You're upset because Sargon was actually engaging with the discussion and not virtue signaling at the forefront of his mind?

IS that your issue?

but they are to be kept seperate from facts

Morals are important, you wanted virtue signaling.

i can address both but not both at once without faling into the 'feelz don't care about facts' trap. i agree. they don't