It shouldn't be anyway

@ManAnimal yes, because you can change the amount of added value tax and then change the dynamics of the industry as well.

There is no distinction here, UnScottable

Perhaps. But tangential

Daily reminder of centrist regime <:ahegon:566797166258028548> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanation

But that had nothing to do with goverance

If you do that the state just becomes the federal unless the states fund the federal

Nearest thing we have here to federal tax is import duty

well i can understand the use in paying the local government in your area to fix the roads you actually drive on and etc

Gov is just like PERSON-A

but federal income tax?

no, not yet

They can effect and interact with the market

eu are working on it

<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

>federal

They can hide supplt

Supply*

And add costs

Look up income tax ... And you'll find out the federal banks of each country was slow.

>federal
>Each country

U will find it is unconstitutional

Maybe he means county

Only SELECT taxes specifically allocated beforehand is legal

you're not going freeman on the land on us are you ma?

Not a blank check for anything they decide

Meh

No need

Would be better if it worked that way

Is does when people dont prevert it

No pentagon black hole budget

Or when they are vigilant

Us gov broke in 1945

Dept of WAR should have gone to dept if civil defense

Its on the courts if the us population didn't hold their gov in check no one would

Instead alphabet agencies that destroy balance of powers

The @ManAnimal no because income tax has been around since 1864 in America and it was 1814 in the UK

Yeah these kinds of systems always go corrupt when people realise votes are a commodity

And collapse

See all systems collapse tho