Message from @Lucienne d'Anwyl
Discord ID: 602283923388497936
I just want black ppl off my street
lol
yes, yes but why is one more or less valid than the rest?
did they ever talk about that?
machiavelli has his place too
contemporary wise
because hobbes is a monarchist and rousseau is a loonie
that is why
there is hobbes too
"yes, yes but why is one more or less valid than the rest?"
And now we get to the main problem that results of Liberalism
drives me nuts that most intellectuals speak just to sound smart rather than addressing a real world problem
i never finished leviathan tho
sir thomas moore too
in this i agree with Doom
talk is CHEAP
CHEAP
@ManAnimal the simplest solution to most any problem is force and they seem incapable of comprehending this puzzlingly enough
would it be fair to say locke's version is prolly the closest to reality
they stumble their way into using force sure
in the likes of antifa and hostile government
true, but showing the williness and ability to apply force is require to be heard
it just contradicts their own views
yknow?
they uh
want to force their views on others
but at the same time
intellectuals feel they are ENTITLED to be heard because of big brain
hate police and authority
doesn't work like that
it seems paradoxical
earn respect, or be ignored
Sargon should write a book
We need people like sargon as well and people willing to move the ball as well
"Why I should be elected president of the New English Republic" -Sargoy
both have a role
out of curiosity mananimal
what are your thoughts on tarrant
in a hundred years there will be a half White quarter Indian quarter black British man sitting in his basement quoting sargons book about why we need liberalistism
tarrant?
Locke's version literally claims that the will of the majority is automatically moral and fails to consider the fact that we live in a functionally closed system. As far as I'm concerned, it's ramblings meant to justify the accumulation of power by the merchant class. Nothing more.