Message from @ManAnimal

Discord ID: 603412904452292618


2019-07-24 02:25:25 UTC  

It's another thing if they told you but you still took them to a backroom.

2019-07-24 02:25:26 UTC  

yep its b.c people are attributing motive to persons personal preferernce in discrimination

2019-07-24 02:25:34 UTC  

well @D3bug_logic even google isn't a monopoly, only 92% of the market right? youtube isn't a monopoly, we have bitchute!

2019-07-24 02:25:38 UTC  

but functionally there is no alternative

2019-07-24 02:25:49 UTC  
2019-07-24 02:25:55 UTC  

yes it isnt a monopoly but it does take govt money

2019-07-24 02:26:02 UTC  

and visa/mastercard are a great example. not monopolies but they act in parallel so you don't really have an alternative

2019-07-24 02:26:19 UTC  

An open platform is like a bulletin board.
Anyone can put up a poster on a bulletin board. The person who actually built the board isn’t responsible for anything that is posted on it. All they did is use some carpentry skills to make a board.
Now, if the board maker decides to put a glass panel over it, and start reviewing what goes up on it, he isn’t operating an open platform. He’s now a publisher. He is now responsible for what people are putting up there.
So, if YouTube wants to be an open platform, great. They can do that. If YouTube wants to be a publisher, that’s fine too. But there are consequences. They’re now liable for everything that is posted on YouTube. *They’ll* be up for all the copyright issues, *they’ll* be responsible for incitement charges.

2019-07-24 02:26:19 UTC  

well it is the banks not the cc companies

2019-07-24 02:26:28 UTC  

google takes gov money for defence projects

2019-07-24 02:26:35 UTC  

who doesn't?

2019-07-24 02:26:37 UTC  

that could still be covered under anti-trust legistation, if you have companies price fixing

2019-07-24 02:26:49 UTC  

it's not price fixing, they're service fixing

2019-07-24 02:26:53 UTC  

someone has to do the work for the gov?

2019-07-24 02:26:54 UTC  

deplatforming isn't price fixing

2019-07-24 02:27:03 UTC  

you want the gov to do the work THEEMSELVES?

2019-07-24 02:27:11 UTC  

preference isnt discrimination you dang dinguses

2019-07-24 02:27:20 UTC  

it literally is

2019-07-24 02:27:22 UTC  

yes preference is discrimination

2019-07-24 02:27:27 UTC  

i discriminate by preference

2019-07-24 02:27:29 UTC  

else youll also have to defend trannies saying not liking dick is also discrimination

2019-07-24 02:27:32 UTC  

but its not necessarly bigorty

2019-07-24 02:27:33 UTC  

i prefer white meat

2019-07-24 02:27:41 UTC  

but it's not like oh maybe I'll give the tranny a go this time

2019-07-24 02:27:49 UTC  

The fuck is being talked about here/

2019-07-24 02:27:52 UTC  

you have an absolute preference/discrimination of no trannies

2019-07-24 02:28:06 UTC  

In short, any private business, including social media companies, have the right to ban anyone, for any reason, at any time.
But, they’ll no longer be open platforms, they’ll be publishers. And they haven’t really thought through what that means.

2019-07-24 02:28:08 UTC  

yes, no trannies; no small tities

2019-07-24 02:28:10 UTC  

no communists

2019-07-24 02:28:13 UTC  

intent matters and generally these situations should be left to be solved by the individuals persons

2019-07-24 02:28:29 UTC  

there is a level at which these companies get too big and do require some govt intervention

2019-07-24 02:28:35 UTC  

the trick is determining at what point

2019-07-24 02:28:47 UTC  

intent cannot be proven

2019-07-24 02:28:48 UTC  

Drawing lines is good

2019-07-24 02:29:16 UTC  

if its a small business they should have maximum leeway to discriminate

2019-07-24 02:29:16 UTC  

cause people commit the same action with various different intentions

2019-07-24 02:29:31 UTC  

No. The government should not interfere. The free market will win out eventually. Competition is the answer.

2019-07-24 02:29:41 UTC  

no

2019-07-24 02:29:43 UTC  

anarco market?

2019-07-24 02:29:50 UTC  

no there needs to be some regulation