Message from @Vindi

Discord ID: 603412431649374210


2019-07-24 02:22:57 UTC  

Yikes

2019-07-24 02:23:17 UTC  

Should dating sites be able to be gay only or straight only?

2019-07-24 02:23:21 UTC  

basically what I'm getting at is that I think we should lean towards compelling service rather than an absolute right to refuse service. if you are compelled to sell donuts, youtube can be compelled to allow service too

2019-07-24 02:23:24 UTC  

yes

2019-07-24 02:23:26 UTC  

>Girls like Luci
Don't lie ManAnimal, you'd stretch that poon given 3 dollars and half a chance

2019-07-24 02:23:27 UTC  

they should

2019-07-24 02:23:31 UTC  

agreed

2019-07-24 02:23:43 UTC  

but why would i let him tbh

2019-07-24 02:23:43 UTC  

preference is inherently discriminatory

2019-07-24 02:23:49 UTC  

it's fucked up if they allow both

2019-07-24 02:24:15 UTC  

>implying animals can consent

2019-07-24 02:24:21 UTC  

cause if i ever found out a blind date was a trap, i'd punch him immedately in the adam's apple

2019-07-24 02:24:27 UTC  

If a company has a monopoly or accepts govt money it should not be able to refuse service

2019-07-24 02:24:29 UTC  

then piss on him

2019-07-24 02:24:40 UTC  

just for being dishonest

2019-07-24 02:24:47 UTC  

the funny thing is it's illegal to discriminate based on gender but virtually every person on the earth does that when choosing a mate

2019-07-24 02:24:49 UTC  

So you'd suck his dick and kick his ass?

2019-07-24 02:25:21 UTC  

I got no problems going BACK to prison, boi

2019-07-24 02:25:25 UTC  

It's another thing if they told you but you still took them to a backroom.

2019-07-24 02:25:26 UTC  

yep its b.c people are attributing motive to persons personal preferernce in discrimination

2019-07-24 02:25:34 UTC  

well @D3bug_logic even google isn't a monopoly, only 92% of the market right? youtube isn't a monopoly, we have bitchute!

2019-07-24 02:25:38 UTC  

but functionally there is no alternative

2019-07-24 02:25:49 UTC  
2019-07-24 02:25:55 UTC  

yes it isnt a monopoly but it does take govt money

2019-07-24 02:26:02 UTC  

and visa/mastercard are a great example. not monopolies but they act in parallel so you don't really have an alternative

2019-07-24 02:26:19 UTC  

An open platform is like a bulletin board.
Anyone can put up a poster on a bulletin board. The person who actually built the board isn’t responsible for anything that is posted on it. All they did is use some carpentry skills to make a board.
Now, if the board maker decides to put a glass panel over it, and start reviewing what goes up on it, he isn’t operating an open platform. He’s now a publisher. He is now responsible for what people are putting up there.
So, if YouTube wants to be an open platform, great. They can do that. If YouTube wants to be a publisher, that’s fine too. But there are consequences. They’re now liable for everything that is posted on YouTube. *They’ll* be up for all the copyright issues, *they’ll* be responsible for incitement charges.

2019-07-24 02:26:19 UTC  

well it is the banks not the cc companies

2019-07-24 02:26:28 UTC  

google takes gov money for defence projects

2019-07-24 02:26:35 UTC  

who doesn't?

2019-07-24 02:26:37 UTC  

that could still be covered under anti-trust legistation, if you have companies price fixing

2019-07-24 02:26:49 UTC  

it's not price fixing, they're service fixing

2019-07-24 02:26:53 UTC  

someone has to do the work for the gov?

2019-07-24 02:26:54 UTC  

deplatforming isn't price fixing

2019-07-24 02:27:03 UTC  

you want the gov to do the work THEEMSELVES?

2019-07-24 02:27:11 UTC  

preference isnt discrimination you dang dinguses

2019-07-24 02:27:20 UTC  

it literally is

2019-07-24 02:27:22 UTC  

yes preference is discrimination

2019-07-24 02:27:27 UTC  

i discriminate by preference

2019-07-24 02:27:29 UTC  

else youll also have to defend trannies saying not liking dick is also discrimination

2019-07-24 02:27:32 UTC  

but its not necessarly bigorty