Tell that to the fighting folks.
Because it was never declared by either.
ted levine
You mean, total war. @Tato
thats who jessica janiv reminds me off
true; it's a nuance i guess. point is, i think there MUST be a cost otherwise it becomes normalized
I mean actual war
Weez is an essentionalist while lauci is looking at it functionally
Total war is what you're describing. @Tato
Just to help you communicate lol
Not modern understanding of war
At this point Weez is arguing for official (benefit and political based) definition rather than practicality.
if the sons and daughters of politicians had to fight each time they used military force?
Where the end of the nation is a possibility.
"uuuuh blaire.... it puts the LOTION ON ITS BACK"
we'd see ALOT less invasions
You can have a war and not have the end of the nation.
what do ya think stopped Vietnam?
@svarozhyc You beat me to expressing it. XD
Yes weez thats how it operates in modern system
And back in World war 2
And in World war 1...
The draft began targeting the upper middle class; 1 yr later? US leaves
But war is not an event its a state u can be in war on personal level even
ex: jihad
true, which is why i said i guess it is a nuance thing
to the fighter, there is no such sublty; it's purely intellectual
Yep
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey-B_RDC6oc
<:Nice:595347902155718666>
As said, tell the definition to the warfighter.
Tim "Straws are bad, just like the left" Pool.
is there a name for 'non-asymmetric warfare'?
not sure
duel!
wat
Muh second civil war.
Tim "othas" P"r"o"v"ol"one"
There's names of the tactics...
