it means that you are too accustomed to being able to control not only the solution but the problem constraints as well

And rental/borrow is a good short term solution.

No its not

rather than accepting constraints and asking where the 'slack' is

But rental burns cash reserves.

Rental is bad

It's bad, but having no transportation?

That's worse.

Rental you might aswell set money on the ground and burn it to keep warm

it's just a trade-off

guess that's true, if I were in the tundra in the middle of winter, I'd put a water heater as a higher importance than the car. based on when the question was asked I assumed it meant in conditions normal at most of the world at this time of the year. shouldn't have made an assumption.

Is it optimal? When's life optimal?

but u should EXAMINE the potentials before just making any trade-off

If you can afford a rental you can afford transportation another method

>a fucking leaf

but if you have a car you can escape the tundra

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

they are only interesting in the IMMEDIATE problem

Leasing a car is cheaper than tenting

Commute was 2 hour drive.

who cares if their solution causes OTHER problems later

the wiser course is to ASK for more constraints

Robots

Leasing requires same commitments as buying.

Commitment?

and choice not just based on current requirements but risk analysis of trade-offs

Ever look into leasing a vehicle?

Nigger if you dont like it stop paying or shoot them who gives a fuck about that

the commitment to buy a car being the long term payment

lel

leasing has more requirements

Ayup.

You want to rent which costs 10x the price of leasing

you can buy a cheap car for a temporary situation

use a bicycle

uber

you MUST commit to a long argreement with a lease

you never ASKED the reason for the car

2 hour drive is not a bicycle option.

maybe i need to transport something