Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 610191853064552599
you just proceed to DO
Which is my point earlier, if you have a problem with youre without a car you proba ly cannot afford to rent one
>other people are poking holes in my question
>better spontaneously make claims that i hadnt thought of before to say why im better than them
<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
"I'm better than you!"
--Anna "MA" Kasparian
'poking holes' or 'proposing a solution' is the exact OPPOSITE of what you are seemingly unable to do
both are GIVING more info
neither are REQUESTING
Well, sleep is now more valuable than this circlejerk. Ta.
ta ta
I can see why the you have been the bitches of the Left for as long as you have. lol; clueless
@Lucienne d'Anwyl, you completely miss the POINT of the excercise. The FIRST step of solving any problem is clarifying requirements and one will ALWAYS make assumptions that don't apply. Therefore, the first step is always to ASK QUESTION to narrow DOWN those requirment rather than arrogantly assuming you UNDERSTAND the reason for the question and that you aleady KNOW all the contrraints...
Your pride won't ALLOW you to ask questions...
not to answer pointless discord twatter
lol
... and when someone calls you on an oversight, you simply dismiss it as 'unimportant' stating you don't 'care' DESPITE the obvious investment in arguing previously....
Would anyone here like to debate a orthodox Christian?
“The most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom is 'I do not know'. I do not know what that is.” “the beginning of wisdom is I don't know”. It's so simple, but at the same time so true.
Prove that god exists.
God exists
Done
shit
Mathematics, reason and logic are not the tools for dealing with god.. Reason does NOT say that 'god doesn't exist'; Reason says that god is division by 0....
Undefined
Kek.
Bracket and halves
This is problem solving 101
@hello all debate on what exactly
depends on the type of problem.. but.. garbage in. garbage out
At best, "god" is an assertion.
No
Epistomology and ontology are arguments for or against god only within their parameters, its not equal to actualization
again, even that negation implies you can prove a mutual exclusion with 'god' in order to assert DNE
you can't; so it remains a 'discontinuity'
The only reason gods continue to exist is because people are inculcated into the beliefs necessary to sustain them from birth. Without that inculcation, done at the hands of imperfect people, gods simply vanish of their own accord.