@Laucivol There should be!

that was drilled into an existing salt mine, a very different situation

achernobyl impacted most of eastern europe pretty heavily

an accident in mexico would still fuckover the us

plus youd have incompetent mexicns running shit

also massive body of water, so not all man made

nah, we build a container that can survive catastrophic failure droped from orbit. test the HELL out of it, then launch the waste

i can test a container

They blow up nuclear bombs underground just build the whole facility underground

can't test something to last 10k yrs

have fun with that kiddo

They don't because its already not profitable

Build your nuclear power plants inside of actual mountains.

Problem solved.

rockets are insanely expensive

they don't do it cause of the people they killed

Yucca Mountain already exists

and they arent transporting tonnes of radioactive fuel

succa mountent

i know luci

yucca mountain was never developed

the environmental whackos have kept it from going into operation

Why dispose of fuel, when you can reprocess and reuse it?

don't' be so serious

uh, yes it was

it was not

I know geos who worked there

in yucca mountain there exists two shafts

can't reprocess cheaply

only two shafts

it's just aheat source

The Soviet Union actually launched satellites with onboard nuclear reactors

it was never developed into a storage space

it was scrapped under obama

for whatever reason

i love that video of the lake being SUCKED INTO THE GROUND

Same

Sauce or it didn't happen, @ManAnimal.

lake was right over a salt mine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain_nuclear_waste_repository

I've seen it and its fucking awesome

they got a good way