Message from @SuddenCringe
Discord ID: 599352170785013790
attacks on internet
at freedom of speech
is it all just done just in the name of globalism utopia and they have some communist ideas about how the world should work
or is it just for the lulz
In European Union i see bureaucratic management to enlarge the number of EU citizens, backed by ideological reasons.
What best way to erode national identity, than inserting a great number of exterior populace.
With eroded national identity it will be easier to push for an European Superstate, and we know they want it.
even ussr didnt do that, it was one country but even they thought it'd be stupid to mix muslims atheists and christians
USSR was already a superstate.
Ant their national identity was eroded by other means ages ago.
But EU not being able to use the same method as the USSR.
yeah, but they didnt migrate populace from various republics and didnt try to invade cultures
USSR didn't need what EU is doing now because they shot everyone.
They didn't need to because they were already a superstate and hard pressed to maintain what they had.
they did not shot everyone mate lol it was an evil organization but u'd be surprised comparing incarcerated people now in america and russia versus incarcerated people in USSR esp after Stalin
Yes, i know they didn't shoot everyone.
I was simplifying it
my point is they did not fuck with various cultures for the sake of sovietglobalism
they stated that *we are all the soviet people*
Yes, because they already had communism in all those various cultures.
But EU can't do it with communism, they need to erode national identity with other ways.
they had socialism, not communism to be clear. by their own standards no one had or has communism on the planet lol
i see what u mean, but i dont think that was enough to prevent possible culture wars
Tangent, they had communism/socialism to erode national identities.
EU on their attempt to create a superstate, they don't have an ideology as USSR had to cover the different states.
so bunch of eu boomer socialists want to create USSR 2.0 no matter what cause they hate USSR and their dicks are small
Looks like it.
good thing time is on our side
@yobrotom#1082 funny how I waited for people to come out with this stuff and I want @HAM to make this list flow a little of celebraties whom have been assisnated by the British press. You already mentioned Tommy Robinson. But here's the creepy list:
Catherine Zeta -Jones, won court case against the press.
Amy Winehouse, wins court case against the British press - dies at 27.
Tony Mortimer - takes press and police to court for harassment, they end up planting evidence on him, they did the same to Amy Winehouse.
Ryan Giggs - took out an injunction against the press and MP john Hemingway couldn't keep his mouth shut about it. Becrow tried to prevent him from disclosing more information in houses of parliament.
Peaches Geldof - won a liable case against the British press. There is a possibility they planted drugs on her and killed her.
Am I getting the point across to you? They are the gastapo! And Carl Benjamin knows this and so Does Mark Meecham. Bless their socks. But they have risked their lives to show, what it is like.
You can add more if you like but I know, that once they make up a story they stick to it.
Cliff Richards, won a battle against the BBC.
Lilly Allen, won a press battle, but that was to have an injunction on them.
Cat Deeley, had her phone tapped - but, was too scared to go to court.
Biggest one....
Princess Diana.
Enough said - fake news meant that people were distracted and never really paid attention to what was really going on. Even the celebrities themselves , have had enough of the situation. It needs a hard line government to nip the press in the bud.
The anti-white hatred is strong with this one. The scary part is how many people, usually guilt-ridden white women, might agree with her.
it's mainly single childless women
married women with children tend not to be any more progressive than men afaik because they actually have loyalties
Yeah. I saw an article, can't remember where, that said that women tend to get more xenophobic once they are pregnant. Something to do with actually having an invested biological interest in their group's survival. Whereas men are naturally more protective of the group and cautious of outsiders by default.
This is backed up by the fact that men tend to vote Republican more in the US, which is more in favor of things like stronger border control. In fact, if only men voted, the federal government would almost always be Republican.
In Austria we have mandatory civil service for those who refuse to do military service. It builds character. The US should implement the same system.
Would not surprise me if this was one of the reasons why Austria still has a strong conservative voter base.
I would agree with that. Like how the Romans had the _cursus honorum_ path through civil service that all Roman politicians went through until the late empire.
Yeah. I should add that I believe mandatory services should only exist in a society that has a government and a democratic process. In my ideal society there would be no mandatory services, but in the US it makes perfect sense. I think it makes no sense to argue taxes and regulations are good, but mandatory service is bad.