Message from @HAM

Discord ID: 600894509869563914


2019-07-17 03:18:03 UTC  

But at the same time, Russia was an enemy that couldn't be ignored.

2019-07-17 03:18:31 UTC  

It was a really fucked position to even start out in.

2019-07-17 03:18:57 UTC  

🤦 Russia was their ally for most of the war.....

2019-07-17 03:19:50 UTC  

German intelligence believed that Russia was planning to turn on them, and so they launched a preemptive attack. Later declassified historical documents from Russia revealed, they were *right.*

2019-07-17 03:20:13 UTC  

Russia *was* planning to attack Germany, and Germany just beat them to the punch.

2019-07-17 03:22:29 UTC  

Umm, no. Stalin actually dismissed the intelligence officer who claimed Hitler was going to attack. He really overestimated their logistic acumen. And that's from the Kremlin archives. There were train cars of oil headed from Bakut to Germany when Barbarossa started.

2019-07-17 03:24:03 UTC  

What you have to recognize is that the axis wasn't very good as an alliance. They were basically lying to each other half the time.

2019-07-17 03:25:46 UTC  

I forget the source, I read it a while back. But basically, they were both preparing to betray each other, and Germany just acted first, while Russia still believed they had something to gain from delaying it.

2019-07-17 03:26:46 UTC  

And yeah, they weren't a very good alliance, very opportunistic.

2019-07-17 03:26:47 UTC  

Well my source is Kotkin who is basically writing the definitive biography on Stalin. I'd also add that Snyder draws a very similar picture.

2019-07-17 03:27:33 UTC  

I'd have to rediscover my source, before I could really compare notes.

2019-07-17 03:28:31 UTC  

But also, am I correct in assuming your position is that the Russians *had no* plans in place to betray Germany, prior to the German attack?

2019-07-17 03:31:44 UTC  

Yeah about the soviets were going to invade germany
that was bs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyANHGWbUHA

2019-07-17 03:31:44 UTC  

A big part of it comes down to the simple fact that Socialism, whether German or Russian, does not work very well. So they end up in a situation where they have to keep finding someone new to rob. So yeah sure they all probably had plans to shiv each other at some point. Just that the idea that Barbarossa was some brilliant spoiler attack for an imminent Bolshevik invasion is shite.

2019-07-17 03:32:40 UTC  

If Russia was planning an invasion that year they likely would have moved some troops that way or something.....

2019-07-17 03:35:16 UTC  

Forgive me if I take this source with a grain of salt

2019-07-17 03:36:21 UTC  

That video was pretty fucking epic you should check it out.

2019-07-17 03:36:25 UTC  

Door open on the inside

2019-07-17 03:37:02 UTC  

???

2019-07-17 03:40:15 UTC  

I saw the words undermine holocaust.

2019-07-17 03:40:45 UTC  

COuld you try again in English?

2019-07-17 03:41:14 UTC  

well, my point was more just a meme than anything

2019-07-17 03:42:02 UTC  

No

2019-07-17 03:45:12 UTC  

Well I mean since you brought it up let's watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtACBI1Txrc

2019-07-17 03:46:49 UTC  

Holy shit, I actually watched it, and it's dumber than I thought it would be.

2019-07-17 03:47:43 UTC  

Like, I figured he would just rehash some wiki tier historical documentation about the details of the holocaust, but instead he literally just argues that Hitler being a socialist means he had to have killed 6 million Jews.

2019-07-17 03:48:06 UTC  

Not even that it would be in line with his mission, but that it must have happened.

2019-07-17 03:48:47 UTC  

You weren't paying attention I see.

2019-07-17 03:48:57 UTC  

Basically all he's establishing is *motive*

2019-07-17 03:49:26 UTC  

"Tryanny"

2019-07-17 03:49:29 UTC  

"Tranny"

2019-07-17 03:49:32 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-07-17 03:50:17 UTC  

I'll watch it in a minute but my first contention without even watching it is that holocaust "deniers" don't call themselves 'deniers' they call themselves revisionist.
The genuine historians never claim to deny the Holocaust but simply refute it's details, such as gas chambers, furher orders, etc.

2019-07-17 03:51:45 UTC  

My contention is less that I'm really sold on any particular narrative of what happened, and more that I'm concerned with how aggressively anyone trying to argue counter to the mainstream narrative is silenced.

2019-07-17 03:51:55 UTC  

YEs it was a video about motives. If you want an actual exhaustive account of where the killing happened and why I would suggest Snyder's *Bloodlands*.

2019-07-17 03:53:43 UTC  

My suspicion, is that there were executions of Jews, probably even on a massive scale. Much of the death was likely due to starvation and disease however, and the gas chambers themselves, particularly their widescale implementation is a highly suspicious detail, as is the mass incineration.

2019-07-17 03:54:14 UTC  

The specific *number* is also highly suspicious, but it's perfectly possible there were indeed millions killed.

2019-07-17 03:54:23 UTC  

Exactly. If you're in Europe they'll lock you up.
If you're in America (like with David Cole) they'll have Jewish Terrorist put money out for your head.

2019-07-17 03:55:00 UTC  

And if you're publishing books on Amazon, they'll intimidate the company into taking them down. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

2019-07-17 03:56:02 UTC  

I believe it's highly likely certain details which have been enshrined in the official narrative are largely embellishments. Simply what endured after the more fanciful accounts were whittled away.