For instance he's taking the British national narrative as true in the historical sense (which it is manifestly not) instead of saying that it informs British thinking and self-image enough to be a social reality regardless of being a historical reality
We must find new lands from which we can easily obtain raw materials and at the same time exploit the cheap slave labor that is available from the natives of the colonies. The colonies would also provide a dumping ground for the surplus goods produced in our factories. Cecil Rhodes
I mean, I don;t even believe in the validity of the label "authoritarianism" tbh, so I cannot really comment on the validity of his stance on that without going into a rant
Having read the histories of other countries, I saw that expansion was everything, and that the world's surface being limited, the great object of present humanity should be to take as much of the world as it possibly could. Cecil Rhodes
I contend that we are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. Just fancy those parts that are at present inhabited by the most despicable specimens of human beings what an alteration there would be if they were brought under Anglo-Saxon influence, look again at the extra employment a new country added to our dominions gives.
