you need to form alliances and work cooperatively as that leads to better economic and peaceful times

Yes and there was no threat besides the theory of muh European policy

imagine - hitler takes over continent and forms european empire

A unified Europe under German dominance is an OBVIOUS threat

if you cannot see that

turns his sights to UK

you are, as I said, a brainlet

(anything under german rule is a theat<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608> )

Just as a Napoleonic Europe would have been a threat

beyond obviously

Napoleon couldn't invade Britain

MO-RON

he tried too

literal moron

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj_9CiNkkn4

why does the wooden wall work? because continentals have to spend a good chunk of their budget on land armies so they don have as much left for the navy. IF they are strong nuff, that stops being true and if they are all unified under one capital, then that CERTAINLY is no longer true.

THUS

unified Europe BAD for Britain militarily

a kindergartener should be able to understand this

furthermore, if you subscribe to Jared Diamonds theory a disunified europe allowed for techonological advances while a unified china was stuck in the stone ages

Unified Europe never happens. It always collapses in on itself regardless of British influence.
It's trying to now and it's collapsing and it didn't need Britain to do that.

HAM

Napoleon and Hitler tried

and if it DID happen

it'd be bad for Britain

THUS

something has never happened (because british influence) means it wouldnt happen without british influence

Based on WHAT

it is in Britain's interests to stop that

lol

british interfered with Napoleon

you could even mention the romans

british interfered with hilter

rome unified europe

both failed, im thinking the british did a good job.

invaded british isles

very true

see you can only conquor europe if you get britain <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

nah

Britain was just stronk so it used that strength to destabilize

as any reasonable actor would