yes, well, functionality and practicality lose meaning in politics

derp

That's how my brain goes reading this conversation tbh

we're not participaitng in politics; we're having a plebian conversation

So, he is a fanatic Sodical Democrat, fanatic enough to create a political organization for said ideology.
You will excuse me if i don't expect much Impartiality from anyone of that reputation.

Activist to the core as well.

I just can't agree that he's a "fanatic" of anything.

Cenk and crew are 'fanatics', certainly

and Mike to an extent

He was with Cenk when they both made the Justice Democrat organization, he was one of his crew.

yes? and Cenk banged the drums for Hillary and Russiagate

So, he is ok because he didn't fall for a consipiracy, and that a good excuse the other 90% of the political ideology they share to the extent they created an organization for activism?

Kyle even appeard on TYT on election night as a warning voice saying HIllary is not a certain winner

and they waved him off

and he has a consistent record of free speech advocacy

You can do all of those, and be partisan, fanatic and biased.

no...... you really can't

biased, yeah, but not partisan

at least not nowadays

This reminds me of when my dad told me about his parents fighting over whether a certain color was blue or teal. They almost divorced over that.

Yes i can, he is still an activist frevently advocating for an ideology, to the level of creating an organization for said ideology.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/partisan

yes, he's an activist to an extent? I still don't see why you keep bringing that up, or how this discussion became all about Kyle

because it's kyles video

Well, yeah. It was his video, and i commented that i do not turst much of Secular Talk because of his biased opinions.

and I was just wondering in what specific direction, because if you said "he's biased for democrats" I'd have to correct you

No, i never said that he was bised to democrats.

no, but then you said socialist and...... well translation just broke down from there

I said he was biased to 100% socialism, then i was forced to correct myself to 100% social democrat.

relative to republicans, yes he is

^

basically we've been screaming at each other over relative and subjective perspectives

what a fucking great use of time

in respect to republicans, he *is* biased towards democrats

pick a goalpost joker

and partisan is more than just dems-vs-reps

Pffft, i didn't have a single problem, all i have said are true. He is 100% biased to one ideology, he is an ideologue.

and it seems we're never going to agree on that

What that he is an ideologue? That he advocated for socialism brought in by a democratic process?

Except he didn't, because you're not going to get away with just throwing around "socialism"

He wants government incentivization of Worker owned cooperatives.