Message from @everybodydothatdinosaur

Discord ID: 602739557279989791


2019-07-22 05:48:07 UTC  

The tariffs on Mexican produce imports have positively affected Americans such as myself in agriculture

2019-07-22 05:48:13 UTC  

@everybodydothatdinosaur are you retarded? if thats the case why did he literally try to pressure mexico for it, even though it was just for like a week

2019-07-22 05:48:20 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598762585315082260/602738675805061129/gbnmdfbmdfklbmndfl.gif

2019-07-22 05:48:26 UTC  

during the election he meant 100% literally

2019-07-22 05:48:32 UTC  

Mexico would pay for it

2019-07-22 05:48:51 UTC  

No he didn't, you can go back and watch his speech xD

2019-07-22 05:48:57 UTC  

I'll find you the transcript, hold on a second

2019-07-22 05:49:04 UTC  

New york times cucked out and it's removed now lol

2019-07-22 05:49:17 UTC  

No, mexico would pay for it as punishment, because they do shit for their people...
Literally fucking cartels are running that country... And women are going missing each week in big cities.

2019-07-22 05:49:28 UTC  

Wayback machine

2019-07-22 05:50:03 UTC  

👌 😂

2019-07-22 05:50:34 UTC  

This speech is later on

2019-07-22 05:50:39 UTC  

This barrier is absolutely critical to border security. It’s also what our professionals at the border want and need. This is just common sense. The border wall would very quickly pay for itself. The cost of illegal drugs exceeds $500 billion a year. Vastly more than the $5.7 billion we have requested from Congress. The wall will always be paid for indirectly by the great new trade deal we have made with Mexico.

2019-07-22 05:51:06 UTC  

I tried to internet archive it but it's not working D:

2019-07-22 05:51:13 UTC  

'Indirectly'

2019-07-22 05:51:38 UTC  

Yeah it would pay for itself, but for most of the time he said it, he said it a lot, he meant literally mexico would send funding

2019-07-22 05:51:48 UTC  

This is back in 2016

2019-07-22 05:51:52 UTC  

And this is the guardian

2019-07-22 05:51:57 UTC  

There was literally talkes trump asking for money from Mexico

2019-07-22 05:52:00 UTC  

No, the media was saying they wanted mexico to send funding.

2019-07-22 05:52:00 UTC  

Mexico said no

2019-07-22 05:52:03 UTC  

but it happened

2019-07-22 05:52:17 UTC  

Trump literally said mexico will pay for it indirectly

2019-07-22 05:52:27 UTC  

Multiple times

2019-07-22 05:52:31 UTC  

Indirectly isn't literal.

2019-07-22 05:52:45 UTC  

"But in the end, Mexico is paying for the wall."

2019-07-22 05:52:53 UTC  

As punishment...

2019-07-22 05:53:44 UTC  

"“What we save on the USMCA — the new trade deal we have with Mexico and Canada — what we save on that, just with Mexico, will pay for the wall many times over just in a period of a year, two years and three years. … So I view that as, absolutely, Mexico is paying for the wall.” This is back in 2015

2019-07-22 05:53:52 UTC  

Before he got elected

2019-07-22 05:53:57 UTC  

Remember to archive links btw, they go dead sometimes, if you try to search for some again.

2019-07-22 05:54:20 UTC  

""The U.S. has a 60 billion dollar trade deficit with Mexico. It has been a one-sided deal from the beginning of NAFTA with massive numbers... of jobs and companies lost. If Mexico is unwilling to pay for the badly needed wall, then it would be better to cancel the upcoming meeting,"- Yes, trade defict

2019-07-22 05:54:25 UTC  

"“What we save on the USMCA — the new trade deal we have with Mexico and Canada — what we save on that, just with Mexico, will pay for the wall many times over just in a period of a year, two years and three years. … So I view that as, absolutely, Mexico is paying for the wall.” This is back in 2015

2019-07-22 05:54:37 UTC  

His argument was always indirectly

2019-07-22 05:54:48 UTC  

The media just twists things out of context

2019-07-22 05:54:50 UTC  

it's what they do

2019-07-22 05:55:11 UTC  

And this is the diversity - Division.