Message from @UnScottable
Discord ID: 604165875322585094
The point is you do have to use Google, even if unintentionally, since most of the tech industry depends on Google
Yes, but I make it harder for them to get my information
reminds me of what Tim Pool says and its so true. Where he talks about asking his friends "Hey did you here about that Project Veritas video?"
"project what now?"
There's nothing that's more telling than search results. General browsing is a close second.
"what about the brett kavanaugh hearing"
"who?"
_opens SnapChat_
And imposing crippling restrictions will a) Bring the tech industry to a temporary halt and stocks crash b) Open door for govt. gatekeeping of the internet
@UnScottable At the same time in completely foreign countries everyone knows about #MeToo
The double standard is real
its so weird man...
🤡 🌎
But it's good they know about the metoo movement, because it's currently falling apart
It wouldn't change anyone's minds about "muh discrimination vs women" who was already feminist-leaning
https://www.nagra.com/sites/default/files/WEB-en_KUDELSKI_RAPPORT_2013.pdf
This person called André Kudelski is part of the Bilderberg group and his company makes e-passports
But the rest of the people will learn something important
He has said that he wants to make it so that people need "e-passports" while signing in to the internet
The recent ramp up in censorship is manufactured so that it paves way for the govt. to step in and allow his plans to succeed
If that happens, internet anonymity will no longer exist at all
e-passports? That sounds like a legal nightmare
>e-passports
Unless it's country-specific
>opens vpn program
<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
Yeah fuck that, that's what the Chinese do
And they do it knowing full well how risky it is
People will refuse to be controlled
That's why I don't think giving govt. the control of big tech is better than the current situation
Dude, big tech IS the new government
They're basically a shadow government
There still exists room for people to start their own companies and websites
Like Gab, Voat etc,
Under govt. control, that won't be possible
well at least in the USA
the gov can only protect rights under the law... so essentially any action taken place would have to protect a right
also they are already breaking Section 230 code
so technically new legislation would not need to be introduced to enforce freedom of speech
just revoke Section 230 protection and watch them crumble
I don't think that's gonna work