who cares what skin color people are working and living in country

Because those people generally have different cultures to you.

And as we've seen in the UK, they don't integrate into the society

And form parallel societies.

Which causes social tension.

Because race and culture both are an integral part of national identity

IF they assimilated into the culture, then people wouldn't give a shit

race has nothing to do with culture

[TODAY]
2 Somali refugees arrested for alleged plan to join ISIS
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/2-somali-refugees-arrested-for-alleged-plan-to-join-isis/vi-AAF4mMN

And I love when people reduce race to "just skin color", lays bare the dishonesty/ignorance immediately

Race has absolutely everything to do with culture

It is quuestionable if race even exists aside from variations of shapes and colors

LMAO

Read this up

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/329/

added to bookmarks

This article analyses this question on a variety of genetic parameters

And compares it to other species, to conclude races absolutely do exist and are a biological reality

does he give sources and links to actual scence journals

Yes

Almost every other line related to the argument is linked to a peer reviewed paper

let's grant you existence of race, it still means that different people can chose better way of living because we have free will

Individually, maybe. Statistically, highly unlikely.

What west needs is pure laissez-faire market with no free gibs

Oh god

No it doesn't

https://youtu.be/oQ3Mqp5bQsg

You're probably the type of person to complain about what Facebook, Google and Twitter are doing

Yet you say that

No, I dont give a fuck about them doing anything that isnt strictly illegal

they dont owe me a platform

You don't care about personal freedoms?

Also US is not laissez-faire

Thankfully yeah

My personal freedom doesnt include free access to someone elses property

Facebook is not owned by me

Even if we grant that people can adopt customs and cultures, nations have a right to preserve their sovereignty and pursue their own destiny

What about when access to that property is a de facto requirement for a high quality of life?

No one owes you high quality of life

And thus they can allow or disallow anyone they want

Ah, libertarian