I mean that would create disturbances of airflow only at the turbine inlet

But not at the wings

You've got to deal with the slow moving air over the wing and the fast moving air away from the wing, though

Too much stress on the turbine blades to be mixing those airflows

You'll end up with compressor stalls

http://is2.4chan.org/g/1564155246614.webm

And the turbo fan will backfire

Also requires maintenance more often than when the engines are just offset from the wing

I can't find it, but there was a proof of concpet that used "air flaps"

I.e. the bypass air from a turbine was exiting through the slots at the ends of the wings

And depending on how it was directed it acted as flaps

Basically entire read edge of a wing was acting as an exhaust

So thrust vectoring?

http://is2.4chan.org/g/1564268063331.jpg

no

but also yes

A picture would certainly help

Thrust vectoring inside the wings, not at the end of a turbine

Okay, I think I have it

I am trying to find it, but it may be that some military got interested and it went underground

So if the engines were off, the control surfaces would still work

But while the engines were on, the airflow was directed somewhat by the surfaces?

https://newatlas.com/worlds-first-flapless-aircraft-maiden/59524/

found it

there were many more articles about this

I wonder where they all went

It is based on the fluidics field of science

An art of affecting a flow of liquid (or air) with a smaller amout of controlled injection

Very much the transistor principle

But with fluids

And yes you can make a fluidic claculator based on this principle

https://i.redd.it/amjyi8nn6x911.jpg

I wonder how this one behaves in flight

Like shit, I imagine

https://imgur.com/r/gifs/o0fgnIX

the nazi one doesnt exist...

http://is2.4chan.org/gif/1564317871470.gif

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898> <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

...

http://is2.4chan.org/gif/1564315451988.webm

http://is2.4chan.org/gif/1564315518732.webm