Message from @Monstrous Moonshine
Discord ID: 606977816235474967
Cuz many years ago people though that was worse than a lot of the “bad drugs”
But in some obvious instances, the answer is clear
Like with coccaine and abhorrent practices like selling pee
We already ban selling of bestiality porn
That is also a transaction
i can agree with you that they are abhorrent
but i that the goverment shouldn't play a role in this
They absolutely should
I think we should regulate weed like alcohol
Government is not a sterile entity meant to do nothing
They are a force to advance society
That is why we have democracy
let me rephrase my statement the government shouldn't get involved in some cases and in the other cases they shouldn't ban it but regulate it
with the weed stuff
They should either ban it or regulate it, depending on which is more beneficial
And do gauge that, you conduct studies
most of the time banning it causes a lot of problems
Not really
for example drugs giving money to cartels
And in many of those cases that is failure on the part of the government
i agree
but thats how the goverment works
they are really bad at their job
No, in many other cases, govt. intervention is better than not banning or not regulating
some cases yes
a lot of cases no
As I said, it depends on how the govt. actions are undertaken
It doesn't mean you have to abandon the govt. altogether
i agree u do need government
but a limited government is much better
Difference is, you are taking it as an axiom
I'm depending on empirical evidence
Small government can be better in some instances, worse off in other
yes it does depend on factors
i honestly think certain aspects of the government should be expanded
and others should be remove or limited
Border wall is an example of a big government program that is necessary
And other forms of immigration restrictions
agreed