Message from @Uksio
Discord ID: 610809468183380021
Interesting
When did I say it was wrong to point out nuance in things
I guess some people need "[this thing] bad" "[that thing] good" logic only
Nuance be damned
No human being can ever think solely in literal terms
You need to generalize to apply your thinking in practice
@Skogarbjorn It was in responce to @randomNPCno3
"You can argue anything, that's why shitposting works. It's just with some things you'll be objectively wrong"
ah
I want to avoid the type 1 thinking when I analyse politics
Knee-jerk feels-type thinking in patterns is not helpful there
Aye, over-generalizing does us no favors
Anything includes facts like 2+2=4, pointing out nuance is important
Heuristics are not helpful when there is nuance that can sway it either way
2+2 is not always equal 2+2
Because those sets of numbers IRL will relate to sets of things that can't be interchanged as it is accepted in math
And if you're just doing arithmetic and not relating it to anything irl?
That is gross and at the same time memetastic
Some fine swine
you can call him a smooth swine
I guess it is because I saw animals being slaughtered as a kid and did not become desensetised to that at all
yeah
swine lives matter
Really? I held the bolt gun to the cows myself as a kid
Well, when I first saw that, it was accidental and the poor sheep was beheaded alive
I had nightmares about it after
So yeah, nobody explained it to me, and it was hard to make sense of it
Ah, that would do it. I had been hunting for years at that point. For me I was just getting dinner
gay
hey doods
hypothetically, if a grown man has asbergers but he has not been diagnosed with it, would it make any difference for him to get diagnosed?
