Are you a conspiracy-theorist?

the article i gave you wasnt by aoc though

it just clickbaits to redpill read a little more

https://nypost.com/2019/08/15/aoc-says-dov-hikind-cant-sue-her-over-personal-twitter/

>clickbaits
>includes shit with AOC

that's not clickbait

amazing but thats not what im on about

https://www.foxnews.com/media/aoc-electoral-college-scam.amp

Suffice it to say, AOC is a fucking retard

one moronic statement doesnt automatically discredit another statement

>one

>multiple

okay, bud

and again the article i gave you wasnt by aoc though

It's not BY aoc

it just uses the name

I never said that it was by AOC

it includes shit that AOC said

headass

its by someone who if you wouldve looked it up has more credible articles

imagine a scenario: sargon uses jordan peele or whoever to start an article

now, sargon is automatically the same level of idiot, right?

right? right.

That scenario is highly unlikely, given what Sargon's said about Jordan Peele IIRC

Jordan Peele also isn't a credible source for journalism

he's a fucking DIRECTOR

you can differentiate because you "know sargon"

No, I don't "know sargon"

retard

I've watched his vidyas

director who uses blacks for sj points

YES

not a news-source

so it's not something Sargon would use

sargon is the news sourxe

bitcoiner is the newssource

No, Sargon's the distributor of content reviewing the news source

aoc is the clickbait

It's not clickbait if she's actually in the article.

or the point of interest

fucking terminologist