And it must be now

So here it is.

Job done.

<:thinkgon:560211224923734026>

Seems interesting

Thanks for sharing

galaxy brain

The I is for the internal conflicts of the human beeing-standing in the real world, but bound by rules and karma, or leaving our plane of existence into the higher realms, but then you risk losing contact with reality,

this is the realism vs. absolutism debate.

No human mind, neither individual, nor collective can solve it

cause tehre is no solution to this paradox.

Any solution is just contemporary and it depends on the timing and the place.

These are what I call it's philosophical foundations.

In reality it means neither trying to stay the ultimate realist, nor letting your heart and soul be consumed by a divine power.

Divine power of either kind-I'm not referring to any particular religion here.

Whomever manage to struck this balance between the divine and the profane should be challenged to rule.

But his mandate must be as limited as is his ability to keep him or herself in check for sustaining this balance is the hardest thing in the Universe.

Direct consequence of the I is that

THERE ARE NO UNIVERSAL LAWS!

Sorry, constitutions and principles, but nothing is forever in the real world.

Everything is balance and everything is situation.

Whomever gets it right shall be rewarded by being able to produce the friuts of his or her gifts.

Thise who are wrong shall just be exposed by their failure to deliver results.

So there are no absolute constitutions, neither eternal laws.

A law of any kind is only a temporary construct and shall hold power for as long circumstance demands it.

And this is NOT moral relativism.

Mores ain't relative, just not constant, for neither in reality is.

You should check this out

https://youtu.be/AajJBhdRpDA

This is related to what you're talking about

Starts from 10:15 @yordanyordanov

>THERE ARE NO UNIVERSAL LAWS!

That itself is a universal claim

The first Y stands for the world of the inside, or shal I put it

The mind of one.

The relations of man with himself, his own universe and the eternity of his own psyche.

This is why these foundations are individualistic, or may I call them "psychological", thou I do understand may be, psychology isn't teh best wording here.

I'm sorry, guys, but if you are truly advanced enough, you should know some things can't be coped by words alone.

This is why the symbols exist.

You summon the psychology that leads to progress by this equation:

>This is why the symbols exist.
I have a theory related to this as well