Or, shall I put it that way

Imagine a society where every business runs itself on social credit-something similar to communism

Is protected by an independent military comprised by the very members of society themselves not responsible directly to the government.

And its politicians are voted in and out of office from each and every municipality in an order determined by themselves for themselves subjected to rules created by this municipality in concord with its own structures, laws, traditions or whatever.

Here is where it get really difficult explaining how does it all functions,

and where the tricky part really is

But

in concept it means a supreme body created by each of these three spheres-the one responsible for running the economy, the other for running the military and law enforcement and the last one responsible for electing eligible people constructing the laws and statues on the land to be in constant change of discerning among various practices and making decisions by 2 out of 3 vote.

Can you imagine the existence and interactions of these three structures simultaneously?

The areas where they interact can be both broad terms defined in laws and specific cases which will require once in a time decision, but the underlying logic is that if you manage to BALANCE (here key word again) out the rights and responsibilities of each of these spheres in an internally constant manner you would indeed create a balanced society.

It works just like the individual basis outlined by the star works-

first you have these structures which provide the material wellbeing of the citizenry.

They offer the goods and services necessary to sustain life.

People create a stable but not impermeable structure necessary to conduct their daily lives by using their own labour in ways prescribed in laws and regulations.

That structure is protected by other structure comprised of people capable of using force to preserve the functioning of the first and the structure and interrelations of the first and the second structures are defined by a third where people can vote in and out representatives

BUT

The key element is that instead of having the chance to vote in and out representatives once in a certain period of time and then give these people a rather broad mandate to dictate a shitload of ideas, you have a complex structure where people are voted in for a PARTICULAR position by a particular CONSTITUENCY!

Can you imagine a state where the engineers vote for a supreme engineer, the construction workers for a supreme architect, the dockers for the master of shipping and so forth anybody according to THEIR OWN COMPETENCY and sphere of influence and not to some generalized politician, who is supposed to know it all and understand everything?

The simple manner of fact is that all-knowing and all powerful people do not exist and the utmost stupidity of the masses is to give absolute power in the hands of kings, lords, presidents or whomever.

A really working society should be the one where everybody can be elected to a position of power according to THEIR OWN SKILLS and have not a single ounce of power more in what he or she isn't competent in.

A harmonious society is one where people are elected to positions of power within their own competences

and society itself can rearrange its structure, laws and institutions to fit in with the people it itself is comprise of.

That's how a perfectly progressing harmonious society should be arranged as.

No prime ministers, lords, senators, deputies or anything that has too much power on a too broad scale,

but rather a pristine and self-contingent structure where the talents of each and every can be measured against the output for the ALL he or she is capable of producing and is rewarded with a position of power equivalent to his or her skills and that output.

Perfect societies actually don't run on power.

Perfect societies run on the COMPETENCE of the people in power

and absolute power produces absolutely incompetent people.

Tel me about that?

It is why spheres of power should be divided and people held in charge over only that which they can best do.

But on the other hand people should also have some UNIVERSAL spheres of power important for the wellbeing of all where any member of society can participate in.

These I define as the 3 spheres of creation, destruction and decision.

Anybody should be capable of holding power in any of these 3 spheres, however his or her OWN PLACE INSIDE these spheres should not be equal, for people aren't created to be equal.

It translates as anyone being able to produce something, e.g. having a job,

Everybody being able to defend his own country in one way or the other-here is where you need to have a citizenry with military background, a population prepared for war-be it civil or against any other threat and the right for every able body person to BARE ARMS to be able to defend him or herself

It also translates as anyone being able to elect or be elected to a position of decision making authority, or as we put it-a political office, however instead of having some universal positions and institutions, we should have a societies where power is divided by competence and the people who are under the influence of a particular agency are also capable of voting the people who control them, too.

I shall call this kind of DEMOCRACY, for it's a democracy by its basic foundations

STRUCTURAL democracy

for people are voted in and out of a particular position for a particular task and there isn't some universal body making decisions randomly for everything and anything.

Are you being able to now grasp the immense complexity under this otherwise so simple-looking symbol?

Satan just called, he wants me to read this when I go to hell