Message from @Laucivol
Discord ID: 614341391551692800
what do you mean
you're one of them
I'm thinking a generation cool down is what's needed.
And it can't only select for those with the balls to defend america from demographic replacement, but also for some of the values which already were selected for in americans by prior generations, otherwise we're just planting the seeds for future political strife.
"Look, we're just closing immigration into the US for 50 years. Deal with it."
That's probably closer to the best strategy, though I wouldn't' close it for 50. Probably something more like 10 or 15.
I'm not saying it's *right*, but it'll work.
After which we can reorganize new criteria
you're going to have less strife than if you maintain a situation without a white supermajority
Okay, it's reasonable enough to reduce it down to a decade or two.
Not having a white supermajority matters less if you reduce the power of the federal government.
Even many on the "right" are cucks on such issues
See this
ending birthright citizenship is a great idea, tbh
I still don't agree that culture and race are intrinsically linked.
>Trump says administration looking 'seriously' at ending birthright citizenship
>lolberts and neocons flood the comments vehemently opposing it
reduce the power of the federal government how
they're not inseparable, but traits which are inherited from one can inform the other
*However*, the cultural corruption via mass immigration is notable and needs to be dealt with.
What even is a meaningful interpretation of culture without kinship
LP and big umbrella libertarians are controlled opposition
Murry Rothbard once said, the function of the LP is basically a containment area for all the worst libertarians.
Kinship doesn't mean blood/ethnic relations.
Start treating it as leadership for libertarians, and libertarianism is fucked
Learned that one by experience in the military, and hard knocks.
Libertarianism is lacking from the get go
It's axioms are incomplete
Curt Doolittle's Propertarianism is much better in addressing many concerns
There are two key problems with libertarianism. One more or less inherent, and one which festered from a disease incubating within it as a method of subversion.
In any case, I agree that reduction of power at the federal level is key.
I, however, have yet to see anything less than conflict of some form able to bring the needed balance.
The first problem is that too many libertarians assume that people think like them, and hold similar priorities, and would be willing to leave others alone if they're largely left alone to achieve their own ends. The second problem is that libertarians were deceived into believing that they could be culturally lassez faire, in the same way they are economically lassaz faire. And moreover, that not wanting the government to enforce norms and laws, means that they ought not themselves leverage their power to maintain their values in their society.
We tried softball (Obama - seriously, hope and chane) & are now on hardball (Trump).. next is direct application of the bat.
i dunno too much about propertarianism but from what i know about it it seems like it elevates law to an unhealthy degree
Even if you grant these two propositions, libertarianism has many problems
A libertarian order, to be successful, first of all, must secure the exclusion of non-libertarians. And second, those who uphold and value that libertarian order must be dangerous, fierce, proactive, and willing to make sacrifices to avoid being subverted or conquered by alien interlopers and dissidents. Hoppe has a better model for this. Libertarians cannot be hippies. And their peace and security must be earned through strength, preparedness, and a reverence for duty.
It can't be an atomized society of exclusively self-interested parties. But those who share a foundational common purpose.
And it must recognize that those who value libertarianism sincerely are not typical of the human race. They are the exception. And that what is *normal* for mankind, is to achieve their ends through aggression, or through leveraging the aggression of others, where they expect the benefits to outweigh the costs.