Define "Europeans" at this time. XD

i mean american whites also "let" anti-white policies win in america

augustus is controlled opposition, even if he himself doesn't know it

also european immigrants would probably come moreso from eastern europe

he's bankrolled by the same dude who pushed the charlottesville clusterfuck

I don't really want the the american whites who let anti-white policies win in america to be here either, but they already are. And it's a better ratio than adding even *more* of them.

We would need a pretty selective filter for what kind of europeans will be allowed if we do this.

what do you mean

you're one of them

I'm thinking a generation cool down is what's needed.

And it can't only select for those with the balls to defend america from demographic replacement, but also for some of the values which already were selected for in americans by prior generations, otherwise we're just planting the seeds for future political strife.

"Look, we're just closing immigration into the US for 50 years. Deal with it."

That's probably closer to the best strategy, though I wouldn't' close it for 50. Probably something more like 10 or 15.

I'm not saying it's *right*, but it'll work.

After which we can reorganize new criteria

you're going to have less strife than if you maintain a situation without a white supermajority

Okay, it's reasonable enough to reduce it down to a decade or two.

Not having a white supermajority matters less if you reduce the power of the federal government.

Even many on the "right" are cucks on such issues

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAltRight/comments/cu1bal/trump_ponders_on_ending_birthright_citizenship/

See this

ending birthright citizenship is a great idea, tbh

I still don't agree that culture and race are intrinsically linked.

>Trump says administration looking 'seriously' at ending birthright citizenship
>lolberts and neocons flood the comments vehemently opposing it

reduce the power of the federal government how

they're not inseparable, but traits which are inherited from one can inform the other

*However*, the cultural corruption via mass immigration is notable and needs to be dealt with.

So, we end up reaching the same conclusion from different premises.

What even is a meaningful interpretation of culture without kinship

LP and big umbrella libertarians are controlled opposition

Murry Rothbard once said, the function of the LP is basically a containment area for all the worst libertarians.

Kinship doesn't mean blood/ethnic relations.

Start treating it as leadership for libertarians, and libertarianism is fucked

Learned that one by experience in the military, and hard knocks.

Libertarianism is lacking from the get go

It's axioms are incomplete

Curt Doolittle's Propertarianism is much better in addressing many concerns

There are two key problems with libertarianism. One more or less inherent, and one which festered from a disease incubating within it as a method of subversion.

In any case, I agree that reduction of power at the federal level is key.

I, however, have yet to see anything less than conflict of some form able to bring the needed balance.