Complete non-sequitor

Go impulsively jerk off sweetheart it's totally good for you

I won the argument so hard

Just instantly fold to your temptation

I mean

I'm laughing so hard at this guy

😂

Teenagers give in to the temptation, so it is not like you are doing anything great about wanting to win an argument rather than being truthful about it @Imaorange

ANSWER ME DO YOU SCRATCH

YOU DIDNT ANSWER SO I WIN

Are you 12? 😂

It's a non-sequitor

It is not really

I think you should get off those pills

I wanted to talk about physiology and science behind masturbation and mental/physical effects

Don't be tempted 😄

this faggot wants to know when I itch my balls

We were talking about the moralistic definition & standpoint on stimuli.

And I was *connecting that* to the *science* which would *support a moral position*

Having an itch, which is as far as I know a series of stimuli intended to protect you from insect predators and disease, is a temptation.

When there's a fundamental disagreement, it must be resolved on a fundamental level, or the debate can't continue meaningfully

That the moralists *unkowningly were correct about*

Science can be immoral.

You have to break a few eggs to make an omlette.

You have to cut up a few corpses in order to learn anatomy.

What does that even mean in this context

You have to desecrate graves in order to investigate time.

You are taking tools and turning them into Gods.

Are you suggesting it was morally right that they had to test effects of jerking off or something

No?

In other words, you assume that a moralist position is the only right way to go about it.

I'm presenting that the moralist position was unknowingly synonymous with the scientific position

rofl

Not *entirely*

But you never let me get to any sort of nuance about it

"I'm accidentally correct, that's how awesome I am"

"I woke up like that"

More misrepresentation

Lol

Won so hard right? 😂

Yep