Message from @HurtChain
Discord ID: 614271635591135233
Wallachia is 13th century Theocratic Romania
And even then, these periods where that happened were usually the exception, rather than the rule.
@Miniature Menace medieval peasants had no education aside from the church, they worked to live and not dying was a bonus, they had no need to be rational
Everyone needs to be rational to a point.
not really
look at leftists
Your modern views don't negate human nature
Even the choice to obey the church so you don't get labelled a heretic and excommunicated is an act of reason
No, that's an act of survival
Even leftists behave rationally based on their perception of reality, and their priorities.
People do irrational things to survive
@Miniature Menace
Some of the disparity is from people who get Pits because they want a tough strong dog. This shows up in the meme of the 100 lb Pittbull (breed standard is a maximum weight of 80 for males and 60 for females. No 100 lb dog is a Pitt by definition). This is further exacerbated by the lugenpress who know 'Pit Bull" sells more ad space so virtually any bull or terrier breed involved in an incident gets reported as a "Pit Bull Attack!"
Irrationality is doing something deliberately under the assumption that it will take you *further* from your chief desirable outcomes.
Did they ever state the date the show is set in? Because a lot of the technologies seem a bit later than that
Like, i would estimate late 14th/early 15th century from havibg watched it
But sure people who buy Pitts but do not bother to learn how to raise one properly are a large part of the problem.
@Miniature Menace that isn't the definition of irrational
I never played the games, though
I'm operating on the assumption that the Castlevania series occurs in an alternate history where the church actually behaves in a stupid evil fashion. And that's how I've basically compartmentalized it.
GATE was pretty good.
I just loved it for the dumb action
@Gservator Then it's not *your* definition of irrational. And that's fine. Are you going to argue that people generally make conscious and deliberate choices to take them further from their chief objectives?
Also not actually that dumb. Did a good job of avoiding being contrived.
I liked that blood bath.
@Miniature Menace no, it's not THE definition
>For Whom The Bell Tolls, instead of the in-show meme of Ride of the Valkyries
Not sure how I feel about this.
Also, this was _long_ before the church had any of the reformations that has calmed it down today. This was presumably before the Protestant-Catholic wars, in a territory right on the edge of Islamic invasion, in the grip of several competing monotheistic religions (Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Islam, whatever remnants of paganism remained)
I just grabbed the top search result.
It’s been a couple years since I watched it
@Gservator I literally don't care. Because that's not really what I'm arguing about. My criticism is related to *my* definition. Address how my argument is actually invalid using the way I have described my criticism.
Yeah, this was right on the cusp of the collapse of the Byzantine Empire and Islamic threat, then
Regardless, really sad that Bookwalker doesn't have it
@Miniature Menace you don't understand english if you think you can have your own definitions
Religious zealotry against due to hostile foreignersbwould have made religious tensions very high
Whether or not the definition you use for "reason" corresponds to the way I use it has no bearing on whether what I'm describing is how people generally behave.
I've got some /ak/ translations at least, but those aren't as convenient.