Message from @Miniature Menace
Discord ID: 617521877484568639
...
hey, I have an idea. I'm going to write a song denegrating a fire hydrant for being a vessel for water
me omw to annihilate zoe quinn
A fire hydrant is not a moral agent
or are you calling whores *objects?*
i mean
<:really:579454670142177310>
An object is defined as a material thing that can be seen and touched so...
inanimate objects
with no personal agency
You're shifting goalposts now
"yeah, sex just sort of happens to a porn star, they don't control it"
Well they don't, they sign a contract and their boss arranges the sex
why are you such a misogynist, denying women agency?
But do pokemon have agency?
Miniature, why you shifting the goalposts so much? Whores are objects as defined above
No goalposts were shifted.
<:hyperthink:462282519883284480>
in what context? in which they are assumed to be real creatures within the narrative of their universe, or with the understanding that they're just executed code with certain imaginary attributes?
In the context of you asking if they are objects and by definition they are
going to cut this 'tism off before it spreads any further
I was pointing out the absurdity of denegrating, or 'dissing' someone for performing the description of their title
I'm using "object" where it denotes they have no agency. Your pedantic powers won't save you here.
The word "object" can have a multiplicity of semantic domains.
I'm using object in the literal
You can diss all sorts of people for doing what's literally their job. Doesn't change that it's their job. But they still chose to perform it.
Miniature, you are an object
and that its completely pointless to try and denegrate a pornstar for promiscuity
We are all objects, technically speaking
Literally speaking
animate objects, but objects nonetheless
It's not pointless. It's fun, and it discourages other women from also being whores.
Fap is degeneracy.
Fap is the holiest of actions