Message from @King Canuck
Discord ID: 614558022827769867
then run those frame through the SIFT algorithm
lidar is best
but you can strip the color out of the image with one command with opencv
A parrallel course to mine was making one such table thing that digitised phyiscal objects
lidar actually has a similar problem; coordinate systems
They got some serious backing from bosch
Like they not just used a laser array and a dome of monochrome cameras, oh no
that was too simple
Those lasers also measured distance each
yeah, I'm trying to integrate those two workflows so i can use photogrammetry info in cad and then laser data combined to photogrammetry
but everything uses different coordinate systems which aren't readily connected
In the end they abandoned the dome idea and went with a turntable that had an arch of cameras and lasers
Actually not an arch, more like almost a complete circle
a lidar array is the best way to go if you can afford the equipment
high accracy
it's just stitching such large datasets can be a bear
that's another area not connected; photo panaroma's and point cloud registration
One side contained lights and normal cameras (for colour data) and the other side had 3 horisontal laser lenses with an array of monochrome cameras and distance measuring inhole camera-chips
meme
MEME
there are some kick ass open source tools but they are all insulated from each other
ME E M
mem
Rather smart reduction of component count
<:thonkvult:580055400376827905> don't you thikn?
my nigger
correct salute
Wrong audience
yeah, that's a common practice; i've been just dumping the pixel colors to a text file and the processing the rest as simple x,y, z
They abandoned the dome because it was just too much information
A lot of redundant and unnecessary data
yup, that's why u need to seperate it using linked lists...
i dump only what i need to a file and index that file with one other
then i load only the data i need
And as a bonus - when you rotate an object you get a stream of data related to the angle of rotation, so it is easier to encode, and then easier to troubleshoot/redo the areas that were not good
yup
I am kinda bummed they didn't make it into a product
I'd buy it
it's a big problem in alot of areas; people tend to what to have everything in one file rather than seperate out data in pieces and then use a reference to look it up in your scrupt
But then again another team (in connection with Frauenhofer institute) made a sinter-welding-metal-3D-printer