cultural is traditional thought with no foundation

so by real you just mean science

"it is as it is because it is so" vs "this is why it is, and you can test this to see it too"

One is a descriptor opposite of "fictional", "imaginary", "made up"
And the other is a signifier of the thing belonging to a culture

A thing can be both at the same time, neither, or any combination of those

i don't think that unscientific knowledge is necessarily without foundation

I think it should be questioned and not blindly followed

Same with science

it should be tested retested and challenged

Yall are already in a cult of Sargon

Yall are fucked

but it is much more trust worthy since it is actually tested

but there's a big difference between not blindly following something and dismissing it outright

But can we trust the testers?

Testers are but mere humans

like the black guy that deradicalized KKK guys, they believed blacks were the problem, then met a black and through the experiment stopped their culture/tradition/norm

the problem with science is that most of the important decisions we make don't have scientific answers

because they never challenged the thought

because culture is the cancer of society, it is just the common thought that we do not question, the lies to children we accept

i mean it's obviously not something that isn't questioned as culture has been in a state of change since the dawn of history

Yes, most of KKK inherited the notion "black man crimed" and just believed in it because parents told them so

It took one black guy talking to them to change their view

A good part of black crime is a self-fulfilling prophecy tbh

I thought transgender was cooky shit, because that's what the culture I was raised up in taught me

Then I met a boy with gender dysphoria that had a history of attempted suicide and abuse

They went on HRT, transitioned, and are happy, clean, in a relationship that has healed them, and realized oh wow so culture was wrong, as always

At any rate, I was raised to question everything whenever I remember to question it

i don't really see what this is supposed to mean

Bascially

I met a trans girl and had no clue

People believe the ideas passed down (traditions), and believe the limits of their actions (social norms), without actually understanding why or if it is right.

A lot of hungarian girls are very tomboy-ish (and still pretty)

I love tomboys

So this hungarian trans girl was fitting the pattern

well the not understanding why part is probably a problem, at least

but i don't get the example because i don't really see why the example given shows that transgenderism isn't "kooky" or whatever

or that even if it did that this would invalidate the concept of tradition outright

the issue with trans people is not really with trans

It's with the rest of so called "trans trenders"

gender dysphoria, actual mental condition, which was treated by safe and monitored transition

People that have some other disorder, presuming that they are trans