smash the fasch

there were fascists governments tho

and they had mixed economies

lol

nazi germany was as direct of an economy as hitler could reasonably muster in the years that he had

>war economy

the us had a direct economy during the war too

lol

nah dawg

just subsidies

look at italy

"uh dont you know that Nazis and commies both hate free spech so there the same" -Ben Shapiro probably

look at spain

by direct you mean centrally planned?

yes

a mixed nationalized economy is pretty normal for fascist nations, generally some form of corporate syndicalism

ok

which is exactly what china has

so...

in nazi germany, it was "you have private ownership, buttttttt"

and chinas economy is the only thing its go going for it

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

"if you dont directly support the fuhrer in the way we tell you, you're an enemy of the state"

that being said china still has communistic influences

china is ultranationalistic, expansionist, cracks down on human rights and has a corporate syndicate economy, which makes them fairly objectively fascist

you wouldnt want to have personal property if it meant youre taking away from the nation right

not ultranationalistic

they are imperialist

the only real "communist" influence left is in their aesthetics and in a few members of their government

and dont mind doing business in the global economy

in fact, they *prefer* it

@2K

fascist nations also did business on the global economy, they simply handled international trade through large corporate / governmental institutions, which... china does...

corporatism isn't too far off from socialism tbh

depends very heavil on which brand of socialism we're talking about here

Marxism-Leninism? yea, basically corporate syndicalism. but platformist socialism like anarcho-socialism, espoused by the likes of Bakhunin and Kropotkin, is a *far* cry from corporatism.

any brand of socialism that isn't a purely theoretical meme

anarcho socialism is meaningless

@ryvergate ok this is my doxx

epic