Message from @Churk
Discord ID: 621112358588121088
I think we went to the moon but some of the stuff they did up there was a little sus
Like the didn’t tell us everything
The astronauts stories don’t always add up
Livestream became a thing in like 2018 but we could broadcast from the moon in 1964 holy fucking normie city
Didn't they find large quanities of thermite residue at the site?
'we wuz' .. more probable than what?
TELL ME HOW YOU CAN BUILD A SKYSCRAPER THAT CAN SURVIVE A BOEING AIRLINER SLAMMING INTO IT AT FULL SPEED
It's more likely we didn't go to moon
>we dud went to see aliens on the moon
Than we did
they found obvious indications of thermite usage and residue commonly found on demolition sites
The moon landings being fake is something i am more ready to believe than the 911 being fake
They survived the impact of jetliners
Just@from my own research
@Churk well that just makes you a brainlet
Why
they did not survive the intense heat caused by burning jet fuel for pronlonged time
and thus collapsed
it's not rocket science
incorrect
And yknow
if the moon landing had been faked, you really think the soviets would have kept quiet about it?
the big giant plane landing in it
buildings of similar construction survived 24 + hours with every floor engulfed
The moonlanding footage is indeed fake, real was destroyed by radiation.
on 5 seperate occasions
I kinda wanna like be there when The last astronaut dies and have him whisper the truth into my ear
No one thinks 9/11 was fake nigger like 3 buildings came down
Just so I know
>destroyed by radiation
***how***
a building in PHL in fact in the last 70s burned for 2 days
was a chemical fire
which burns hotter than JP-5
it was fucking sent back by satellite
Oh I remember now the footage is fake for the most part I believe
Yea since the radiation or whatever
MANIMAL CONTINUES TO IGNORE THAT A HUGE PLANE FLEW INTO EACH OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDINGS
the building suffered no failure structurally
No that part is confirmed I believe