Message from @ManAnimal

Discord ID: 621782495985401885


2019-09-12 18:59:34 UTC  

pharmacuticals are a classic example

2019-09-12 18:59:40 UTC  

But Bose chad company

2019-09-12 18:59:45 UTC  

Indeed.

2019-09-12 18:59:47 UTC  

Bose?

2019-09-12 18:59:48 UTC  

Some soylent night just be like

2019-09-12 18:59:52 UTC  

Böse? Haha

2019-09-12 18:59:58 UTC  

Screw democracy everything mine

2019-09-12 18:59:58 UTC  

The health insurance industry is another, @ManAnimal.

2019-09-12 19:00:03 UTC  

Which is why we have laws

2019-09-12 19:00:03 UTC  

I'll call my company eevel

2019-09-12 19:00:07 UTC  

Christ, don't get me started.

2019-09-12 19:00:14 UTC  

BOSE has an owner with a functioning ethics in his head. He is simply not a psychopath

2019-09-12 19:00:18 UTC  

Oligopolies everywhere.

2019-09-12 19:00:20 UTC  

on the front end, you need massive profit incentive to encourage the development of high tech drugs requiring massive risk and capital investment

2019-09-12 19:00:35 UTC  

but they you also want competition to drive down manufacturing costs

2019-09-12 19:00:45 UTC  

Pharma bros are the worst

2019-09-12 19:00:59 UTC  

but once a company owns a patent, they won't GIVE that info to manufacturers to drive down that cost

2019-09-12 19:01:09 UTC  

Taking profits from people that are on the verge of death is the lowest form of scumbaggery there can be

2019-09-12 19:01:17 UTC  

Pharmacy companies in general are just sus piles of garbage like even without a monopoly

2019-09-12 19:01:24 UTC  

I don’t trust one

2019-09-12 19:01:39 UTC  

the patent is both the incentive to take the risk AND the barrier to making the drug affordable

2019-09-12 19:01:46 UTC  

Patent right needs an overhaul

2019-09-12 19:01:53 UTC  

It lacks balances to prevent abuse

2019-09-12 19:02:09 UTC  

i never 'trust' a company

2019-09-12 19:02:13 UTC  

As evident by Dysney just cockblocking everything for no fucking reason

2019-09-12 19:02:24 UTC  

I tend to agree, Uksio, but you have to remember there is still scarcity in the market, as with any other, and you'll end with shortages, if you intervene in a manner circumventing profit incentives and so on.

2019-09-12 19:02:27 UTC  

i expect a company to be an asshole if it can get away with it

2019-09-12 19:02:34 UTC  

Yup

2019-09-12 19:02:35 UTC  

make the rules so they can't

2019-09-12 19:02:39 UTC  

Nature of people is greed

2019-09-12 19:02:43 UTC  

So, if you do that, you'll harm innovation.

2019-09-12 19:02:51 UTC  

In the long term, more people then die as a result.

2019-09-12 19:02:58 UTC  

The issue is any law that stops bad people could also stop the good ones

2019-09-12 19:03:01 UTC  

You don't need to interveine

2019-09-12 19:03:03 UTC  

Just introduce checks and balances

2019-09-12 19:03:04 UTC  

So it’s a win lose

2019-09-12 19:03:30 UTC  

Pretty sure path of least resistance triumphs greed

2019-09-12 19:03:40 UTC  

the current system with drugs operates on a 7 yr timeline. u have 7 yrs to make a profit but 4 of those yrs are consumed turning the formula into a pill and getiing fda approval

2019-09-12 19:03:55 UTC  

Like, say a progressive tax of the *number* of re-sells of your stock will put a damper on stock manipulation without changing the market

2019-09-12 19:03:58 UTC  

We could also use other colloquial phrases to pretend we're having a conversation

2019-09-12 19:04:07 UTC  

with only 3 yrs to recoup and make a profit, the companies are incentived to do shady dealing with doctors