Message from @Randall_Clark

Discord ID: 634801670886391808


2019-10-18 16:36:49 UTC  

but usually, yes

2019-10-18 16:38:01 UTC  

so is doxing universally a bad thing or not?

2019-10-18 16:38:19 UTC  

as usually means "it depends"

2019-10-18 16:38:36 UTC  

again, depends on your definition

2019-10-18 16:38:53 UTC  

I could more broadly define it as the releasing of personal information about a person

2019-10-18 16:39:02 UTC  

in which case the answer is "no"

2019-10-18 16:39:57 UTC  

see, the reason why we don't hold *specific* actions strictly to simplistic rules is because life isn't so simple

2019-10-18 16:40:06 UTC  

that's why we have *morals*

2019-10-18 16:40:13 UTC  

that exist in a more abstract sense

2019-10-18 16:40:27 UTC  

and require individual judgement to apply to real life

2019-10-18 16:40:42 UTC  

that being said

2019-10-18 16:41:06 UTC  

do not confuse the requiring of individual judgement as explicitly allowing subjective bias into the equation

2019-10-18 16:41:21 UTC  

the purpose of morals is to hold people to standards greater than the individual

2019-10-18 16:53:45 UTC  

the issue is that other than some actions that are punished by law there is more and more division regarding what morality is

2019-10-18 16:54:14 UTC  

and morals start to be defined by groups rather than society as a whole

2019-10-18 17:00:02 UTC  

another word that seems to lose its value is ethics, especially journalistic ethics

2019-10-18 17:10:08 UTC  

except, you are dealing with the problem by literally making it worse

2019-10-18 17:10:14 UTC  

"they make problem, we make problem!"

2019-10-18 17:10:22 UTC  

that is not how you address the issue

2019-10-18 17:14:23 UTC  

@Randall_Clark Morality is a spook

2019-10-18 17:15:12 UTC  

and how would you address the issue, given that each side has their own morality?

2019-10-18 17:18:36 UTC  

that's how human interaction works buddy

2019-10-18 17:18:51 UTC  

and there is no singular, hard-and-fast answer to that

2019-10-18 17:19:29 UTC  

given what you wrote before there is

2019-10-18 17:19:56 UTC  

otherwise not having an answer doesn't solve the problem

2019-10-18 17:20:25 UTC  

strawman

2019-10-18 17:20:34 UTC  

I never said there is no answer

2019-10-18 17:20:55 UTC  

> that is not how you address the issue
this implies there is a way to address the issue
so you must have an idea if you mentioned that

2019-10-18 17:21:23 UTC  

I just did

2019-10-18 17:21:26 UTC  

are you dense?

2019-10-18 17:21:39 UTC  

```[1:18 PM] Coolitic: that's how human interaction works buddy
[1:18 PM] Coolitic: and there is no singular, hard-and-fast answer to that```

2019-10-18 17:21:44 UTC  

no, that's an empty answer without any value

2019-10-18 17:21:53 UTC  

*for people who are socially retarded

2019-10-18 17:22:06 UTC  

this is just normal, human interaction

2019-10-18 17:22:19 UTC  

you are trying to analyze the situation as some sort of robot

2019-10-18 17:22:30 UTC  

looking for single, hard-and-fast answers

2019-10-18 17:22:42 UTC  

sorry kiddo, the avg human is more intelligent than that

2019-10-18 17:22:58 UTC  

I didn't ask for a single solution, I asked for a possible solution

2019-10-18 17:23:12 UTC  

you don't seem to understand what solving a problem means

2019-10-18 17:23:39 UTC  

olive branches

2019-10-18 17:23:39 UTC  

there is no single solution for this