Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 634751536173678642
Read what you wrote yourself, retard.
Dude
One more time
Vee thinks it's ok if a whole family gets doxed
Even if only one of them did something wrong
As long as the person who ddi something wrong
Is not on Vee's team
This means
Vee is making arbitrary teams
He has no moral compass
Well, I said Vee acts like a nihilist in his output at the very least.
When he doesn't side with fascism for being edgy.
No, Vee used to have a strict moral compass
He always said this:
"it's bad if it happens, and I will speak up about it, but that doesn't mean I won't laugh"
THAT was his position
I don't think Vee has changed at all.
That he can laugh about it
Vee has always been a stealing gypsy.
He ONLY refered to his personal amusement
If you continue to play by your "morals" the only outcome is being seen as weak and exploitable. In this game there is always a point where you stop and realize that having higher morals than your opponents is actually counterproductive when you're constantly playing by your opponents rules and are losing every fight.
And here's the thing about doxing, when a leftist dox someone this is applauded by the left, everyone cheers and laughs at the victim, even if doxing has very negative outcomes, when this happens on the right suddenly everyone needs to disavow the doxing and reiterate that it was a very bad thing to do. This results is one side being constantly armed and not having any warfare restrictions, while other is trying to play the pacifist route.
randall
ur a faggot
and can't see past short-sighted tunnel vision
by not playing by the correct morals
you admit that you think morals are weak and inferior
morals are useful when majority agrees on them
no
you dont understand what "morals" are then
they are applied universally, and without subjective bias
that's literally *the point* of morals
well, in that case doxing would universally a bad thing
that depends on your definition of "doxxing"
but usually, yes
so is doxing universally a bad thing or not?
as usually means "it depends"
again, depends on your definition
I could more broadly define it as the releasing of personal information about a person
in which case the answer is "no"
see, the reason why we don't hold *specific* actions strictly to simplistic rules is because life isn't so simple