Since you're stuck on word-thinking, let me put it this way. You're either pro-individual liberty or you're pro-collectivist control.

No

**no in between**

Libertarian vs authoritarian

**centrists dont exist**

hm..........

Obviously, there are degrees within that

While I'm very pro individual liberty

"you're either anarchy or fascism"

okay

nah thats bullshit maru

Now the libertarian is here to tell you why...

The way you worded that

Was very much to the contrary

Centrists exist, they're just horrible fencesitters.

Anarchist is not the same as libertarian. All anarchists are libertarian, but not all libertarians are anarchists

Or, yknow, undecided

1) you cant divide it into two camps, it is not a binary decision, you can be partial pro socialism and pro liberty

And there is certainly benefits to socialism

"pro-individual liberty" "pro-collectivist control"

never heard of a mixed bag

For example you taxes pay for police, fire, military, NHS, etc

Congraulatikns, Maru

You just discovered the political compass!

Wow!

These are all public functions and all benefit from their usage

Very cool Kanye!

In general, if you're a "mixed bag," you are probably inconsistent in your fundamental principles

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Well no

I understand what he means

**maybe there's just some fucking nuance in the world**

But I disagree

Remember guys

You must be American because your next argument will probably be free market fixes all <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

You're either "ppl should handle themselves", or, "I CAN DO BETTER".

Give me an example of positive use of authoritarianism

There are generally two ways ppl think they're right and smart

The military

Not letting niggers in your country.

It is a hierarchal structure that can be used for good or evil