the reason they collapsed in WW2 was for that very reason, no one wanted to fight for the broken government

An actual democracy fails

But a republic is what actually survives

The biggest question on my mind is

british constitution is the most stable in history

You say that

Why are the politicians pushing for this

Brits failed because they didn't codify it

Americans took it and actually said "You really can't fuck with this easily"

that's the difference between british and germans, british are adaptive, germans are hard coded

^

I agree

american system rests on a knife edge because one tyranical governemtn and it's civil war

Which is why it works

It forces the government to actually do it's fucking job

Or we purge it in blood

the british constitution avoids the civi war, simply public opinion will sway towards parliament or monarch, after which the losing side will have to concede

I believe the two major reasons for the public voting for brexit were anti immigration and so the Eu can’t change our laws

it won't explode into war

although, saying that, there was the spanish civil war...

And fuck the krauts

which had a similar dual government to britain at the time

Always fuck over the krauts

hmm..

Well, back to work

Dual monarch doesn’t sound like that bad an idea

Parliament and monarch that is

@S K E L L Y Ivanthenotsoterrible I think there was a multitude of reasons, mostly anti-status-quo, anti-immigration, pro-labour, sovereignty, anti-EU-federalisation

Yeah but they were the two main

@Edelgard von Hresvelg its been a pleasure

Cherrio

Like what the Romans did

Whenever they were having a bad time they’d elect a dictator to basically fix their country

those may have been, but its clear parliament has no intention of fulfilling those desires.

with regards to Romans, I'm no fan of their system, it may have been the longest civilisation in recorded history but I have my doubts

although I'm not read enough, ask me about the british or umiyads and I can tell you a fair amount

but parliament electing a dictators sounds like a bad idea, dictators have to be de-facto and from the public

As I understand it, Rome had a nasty problem with dictators not always leaving well enough alone when that which was needed to be completed, was.

Not the parliament

Come to think of it

It’s like the current monarch