Message from @Terry
Discord ID: 650156760795185156
no, full survival of the fittest more like
^ based
no welfare, don't care if people starve, they either keep up and benefit society of die
that sort of thing
Welp I gotta go for a bit
Well, without welfare, communities usually get tight
yep
And don't let people starve :s
State induced euthanasia as well?
no, less state everything
@RooHappeh Take care bud - Enjoy your day/evening
states job is to protect citizens from foreign threats
court systems for local matters
Wait, wrong person X)
@RooHappeh Disregard my farewell
but that's when I'm drunk, when sober I understand some forms of welfare of good and required for a healthy society but I tend to go to th extreme when discussing politics when I'm drunk for some reason
I don't drink anymore though, been to jail toooooo many times because of that
LUL
Blagh
Hello
Welfare isn't necessarily required
Fellow furry
@RooHappeh I don't think the state should be doing welfare at all.
ever
The best would be increasing social cohesion
local communities can handle that best.
Well, then it's not welfare but charity
Politics < polydicks
if someone in the local community is shunned and no one wants to help them, well they shouldn't have been a piece of shit in their community
for perspective, I admire the amish
Welfare kinda implies state
oops
@Acridian - Full agreement there. I'm from Britbongistan. I know 2 families that have been on welfare for 3 generations. That's three generations of families that have never worked.
I stand corrected @RooHappeh
The only welfare that government could do is providing job c:
@RooHappeh I don't like the state giving anyone anything for "Free". that only makes people more lazy in my experience
@RooHappeh - And there's the birth of middle management.
and if they can't afford to feed their own children then they shouldn't have them
As much as most people think that stuff should be fully privatized, I think that it is possible to make governmental investments
But subsidies should be prohibited