And is backed up by the very existence of the west

Observable reality

So yes we use reality against them but when it fails

and it will.

What have we got left eh? To guide us. I think we can use both things

You can have the morals of a religion without the tradition

a tradition can interfere with a natural right, and when it does it has to lose. because without the fundaments of natural righters there is no basis to protect the individual against the collective.

I refuse to concede the rock with which the house has its foundation

The left will gladly take what they can of that rock my friend

The rock could use a little sculpting

natural rights are the rock, for without them there is no tradition but the mobs tradition

And the rights are guaranteed not just by reason

But yes a spaghetti monster

It’s ok dude lol

To me I’m fine with that

I feel like a lot of people just dislike their parents and they were religious so they are adverse to religion but I could be wrong. To me it’s not really something I’m so adverse too

reason protects nothing. but it is important to get to this point with nothing but its own logical and rational basis. because from this point the west as built. the right to bare arms is the natural right that protects all the others. it is your guarentee against the mob

If someone is like yo my god lets me do this and I disagree such as FGM. I can use reason and if they don’t concede well so what I can say in my tradition it’s bad end of discussion sucka. Boom fighting fire with fire. Your god is false! Mwahahaha

<:Pepe_God:462291834182303744>

It often comes down to that anyways my friend

🤷‍♂️

What can ya do eh

Let me fix that statement. In an area where there is more then them than you, the rule of law in the land, and thus its force, will always be against you.

Right which is why this democracy bullshit

Has got to go.

where as the opposite is true in the west

While our population is still in the majority

nope, even in the minority your rights are protected

there has been some chipping at the edges due to a lack of argumentation, but the core stands firm even in places where you are VASTLY out numbered

This is why I’m kinda meh on these things, I’m kinda flip floppy because I really don’t think liberal democracies are all that fantastic ... I think it’d rather subjective

This idea we’ve “progressed”

The US, is in my opinion, the best country, hand down, for protecting natural rights.

Liberal democracies are lame. Time to try something else. It’s landing us in clown world and it’s going to get worse unless we do something... different.

And we can argue the rights stay from a traditional standpoint

However... the forefathers and etc. did remove or add amendments when necessary

I’m looking at the 19th in particular

most of the clow world issues are caused by 3 fundemental problems, a consolidation of power in the presidency, a change to the senate form an appointment from the state to an elected position, and the weaking of states rights.

Name a government style other than a liberal representative democracy? And then find a country using or that has used it. And tell me, where would you rather be

Could use some uh... editing

Honestly random the way things are going. We won’t feel that way forever. Especially not our future generations

When freedom of speech is taken. Gun rights are taken. Voted to be taken by the majority.