now me personally.. i dnt think god is this dude in a throne or anything like that at all... i think and this is with my own experience

that its more of an unseen force. like gravity

PHDs? so suddenly science isn't biased when it supports your points?

i wanted to appeal to you in a way that included science since you seemed to like that angle

my bad dude

🤷‍♂️

scientists are biased. go figure right lol we all are

bias might motivate their investigation but you'll have to provide hard proof that it colors the results

common joker

and no, wording in a written thesis doesn't count

how many gender studies investigations proving gender isnt real and its a social construct

how many of those do we need to see lol

before we go. you know what.. maybe the evidence they fabricate and etc... well its biased ... and each person decides what they think about that at the end of the day right

gender studies, we all can agree, is not a real science, don't play that game with me

ah so only what joker says is science is science

i seeeeee

🤔

nigger what did I just say about playing games

bitch just because its wrong doesnt mean its not science bruh

yk when scientists do experiments and shit. sometimes they're wrong

except gabbing to each other in a bubble or safe space about how meanie meanie cis white men are isn't a fucking experiment

well they still do the scientific method

they just twist it to fit their bias

the studies are still written with a hypothesis and etc... abstract... conclusion

science is using a method to discover truth right... its using tools to discover truth, so science can be a lot of things... just depends on what truth you are trying to discover or disprove. Right?

or am i mistaken

You can get to a hypothesis that way sure the bar is very low for hypothesis. But to become a theory even you have to make testable falsifiable statements. Here they fail.

For instance if you say, "gender is a social concept and different to biological sex." what is the standard for falsifiability? I would say that over a .9 correlation (it's actually closer to **.99**) would falsify that statement. Gender studies disagree because they have no standard for falsifiability.

except that's not the scientific process

its hypothesis, observation of controlled and uncontrolled experiments, summary of results, then conclusion

and yeah, the bit about falsifiability is damning

Science is also inherently skeptical

yes of course, sadly this wont stop these people from claiming its real. publishing it into their journals/publications. using it to convince people to a point they cant be convinced otherwise

i think this happens with more things then just gender studies

well at that point it becomes about having faith in the populace's penchant for critical thinking

seems faith is coming up more and more these days

<:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

synchronicity, you guys ever think of such things

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QlJcAvQMXo

runs after a jewish man in gta. yelling debate me ben!

WHY WONT YOU DEBATE ME

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>