All I'm saying is that we have the right to nuke the niggers if they cause climate change.

It's much cheaper to prevent CO2 emissions than collect CO2 from the air and deposit it away.

They are going to become a china puppet anyway

And the climate change activists are already saying that carbon reduction is no option, carbon neutrality is no option, the western countries need to be carbon negative, and sunk the costs of China.

Alleged global warming effect aside, CO2 really isn't much of a problem.

I would not want Africa to join China. I want Africa nuked.

Yeah they're wrong

> Carbon negative

The carbon we have to remove isn't even in our hemisphere

But if we cannot nuke niggers, shouldn't they at least skip coal power plants?

>isn't even in our hemisphere
Looks like we're gonna have to do some colonizin'

It's much cheaper to install solar panels in Africa than to clean up the mess afterwards. A coal power plant would be there for the next 50 years if built. It's irreversible mistake.

@Samaritan I don't know if parody but that's Trump level of retardation.

He said freon hair spray (which is already banned in Europe for decades but I guess USA is degenerate) is OK because he only uses it indoors.

As if fucking Earth hemispheres are separated from each other.

Air pollution in Europe isn't going to be affected by smoke stacks in China I live in Australia a lot closer to China and the air here is fine

Now you are right that it would be cheaper to avoid then to cleanup

Okay. I'm discussing with utter retards.

So ocean water circulates via huge currents but the winds don't exist. CO2 in southern hemisphere will stay there forever and what's produced by China stays in China.

"Air here is fine". Well, you don't quite understand that CO2 is not related to "air quality". You don't see or smell it. It's not smog.

It disperses until a certain concentration and that isn't taking into account it not staying in the atmo and settling

The atmosphere is a very big place

Polluting it sufficiently is comparable to filling equally a big space devoid of oxygen with oxygen eg fucking hard

CO2 doesn't "settle" on the ground.

Sure it can be done but it'd take like hundreds of years

Carbon would be heavier then air no?

Carbon **DIOXIDE** you retard!

It's a **GAS**.

It's not coal particles you fucking faggot.

Well we where talking about burning coal nibba

Yeah, gas heavier than N2

And filtering it and the such

and heavier than O2

Burning coal produces CO2, not floating coal particles.

@leavethisbotnet Gas heavier than nitrogen still doesn't "settle" on the ground. It will stay in the atmosphere.

He's got a point in that CO2 is heavier than majority of our atmosphere

It stays towards the bottom of the atmosphere

If you argue that CO2 settles in lower atmosphere, that isn't really helpful. It won't settle on the ground.

I mean volcanic ash and nuclear ash doesn't settle right away but eventually it does was what I was thinking

Also by that logic @leavethisbotnet

We're actually going to be fucked sooner