I just don't believe in NAP **alone**.

You said JFG didn't believe in NAP, i.e it's not at all part of his consideration.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/bbcw19/all_anarchocapitalism_is_based_on_principles_not/

TL;DR

If you disagree with the outcome of your principle, you concede that it is not a principle

I'm not clicking your links. Learn it. I never do.

In 15 minutes of discussing with you, you link at least 6 hours worth of streams and articles.

Principle: A fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning.

I'm not wasting 6 hours of time per every 15 minutes of discussion.

You just throw that shit left and right.

I'm not opening a single link.

Sorry that you're slow

Whatever I link can be viewed in 10 minutes

If you watch at 2x

And follow the timestamps I post

To go back to NAP, JF doesn't believe it to be a Universal Principle

I disagree with whiic a lot but we are 1000000% on the same page here. Dropping links rather than articulating your position is BS.

Already did

The "Principle" part of NAP is what JF disagrees on

And so does whiic

So again I ask, why is whiic advocating for his own death?

How do you get from one to the other? I mean I think that the sky is blue, JF (might) agree there. This hardly means I am advocating for my own death....

Scroll up

I've been peeking in off and on. It seems to be something you just started asserting for no reason.

Also, I'm pretty sure such open death threats/wishing violence go against Discord TOS

Yeah, after you said JFG rejects NAP.

And my position is that everyone who outright rejects NAP having any value, should be treated as an outlaw.

Even you reject the NAP unless you are Ancap

I don't reject it.

The main part is "Principle"

I just don't think it's absolute.

Why are you so autistic?

You're going against NAP by being anti open borders

Which is also JF's stance, he doesn't take it as an absolute principle

So if that is your criteria of advocating for death of someone, you are also advocating for your own death

I do not see how that follows. JF has made numerous (retarded) statements about evolution. I believe in evolution and have been studying it for a few years. One could assume JF also believes in evolution. And yet I find all of his conclusions laughably wrong.

Well, maybe it should be called NAV (non-aggression value) for those who don't hold it as the only value and absolute and only principle in life (i.e the ancap autists)?

But no-one knows what "NAV" is.

Hence, I prefer to call it NAP even if I don't view it as **absolute and only** principle in life.

Because people know what NAP is, but they don't know what NAV is.